rs150536507
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2_Supporting
The NM_000152.5(GAA):c.2415G>A(p.Val805=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00152 in 1,612,432 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
GAA
NM_000152.5 synonymous
NM_000152.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.09
Genes affected
GAA (HGNC:4065): (alpha glucosidase) This gene encodes lysosomal alpha-glucosidase, which is essential for the degradation of glycogen to glucose in lysosomes. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple intermediate forms and the mature form of the enzyme. Defects in this gene are the cause of glycogen storage disease II, also known as Pompe's disease, which is an autosomal recessive disorder with a broad clinical spectrum. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 17-80117683-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80117683-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 194697.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=3}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.09 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | NM_000152.5 | c.2415G>A | p.Val805= | synonymous_variant | 17/20 | ENST00000302262.8 | NP_000143.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | ENST00000302262.8 | c.2415G>A | p.Val805= | synonymous_variant | 17/20 | 1 | NM_000152.5 | ENSP00000305692 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00110 AC: 168AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
168
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000900 AC: 223AN: 247888Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000839 AC XY: 113AN XY: 134756
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
223
AN:
247888
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
113
AN XY:
134756
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00156 AC: 2275AN: 1460250Hom.: 2 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00147 AC XY: 1068AN XY: 726426
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2275
AN:
1460250
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
1068
AN XY:
726426
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00110 AC: 168AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00108 AC XY: 80AN XY: 74348
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
168
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
74348
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Glycogen storage disease, type II Uncertain:3Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 22, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | Jan 22, 2020 | The heterozygous c.2415G>A (p.Val805=) variant in GAA has been reported as a likely benign variant (by GeneDx and Invitae) and a VUS (by EGL Genetic Diagnostics and Illumina) for Glycogen Storage Disease II in ClinVar (Variation ID: 194697). This variant has been identified in 0.1495% (189/126462) of European (non-Finnish) chromosomes and 0.1387% (49/35320) of Latino chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs150536507). Although this variant has been seen in the general population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. Computational prediction tools, including splice predictors, and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, although additional studies are required to fully establish its clinical significance, this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BP7, BP4 (Richards 2015). - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Nov 11, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 13, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2023 | GAA: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 03, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 18, 2022 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 17, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at