Menu
GeneBe

rs150547672

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000169.3(GLA):c.8T>C(p.Leu3Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000159 in 1,208,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. There are 42 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L3V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00086 ( 1 hom., 26 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000087 ( 1 hom. 16 hem. )

Consequence

GLA
NM_000169.3 missense

Scores

3
3
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:10O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.323
Variant links:
Genes affected
GLA (HGNC:4296): (galactosidase alpha) This gene encodes a homodimeric glycoprotein that hydrolyses the terminal alpha-galactosyl moieties from glycolipids and glycoproteins. This enzyme predominantly hydrolyzes ceramide trihexoside, and it can catalyze the hydrolysis of melibiose into galactose and glucose. A variety of mutations in this gene affect the synthesis, processing, and stability of this enzyme, which causes Fabry disease, a rare lysosomal storage disorder that results from a failure to catabolize alpha-D-galactosyl glycolipid moieties. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PM1
In a signal_peptide (size 30) in uniprot entity AGAL_HUMAN there are 11 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (73%) in NM_000169.3
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.024546802).
BP6
Variant X-101407896-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-101407896-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 42464.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chrX-101407896-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000864 (97/112310) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00301 (93/30907). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00251. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 26 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd at 25 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GLANM_000169.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.8T>C p.Leu3Pro missense_variant 1/7 ENST00000218516.4
RPL36A-HNRNPH2NM_001199973.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.301-4040A>G intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GLAENST00000218516.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.8T>C p.Leu3Pro missense_variant 1/71 NM_000169.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000855
AC:
96
AN:
112254
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.000727
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
34410
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00298
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000281
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000664
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000235
AC:
43
AN:
183334
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000885
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
67798
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00319
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000365
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000867
AC:
95
AN:
1095822
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000443
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
361252
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00323
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000852
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000152
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000864
AC:
97
AN:
112310
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.000754
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
34476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000281
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000655
Alfa
AF:
0.0000993
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00115
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00417
AC:
16
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000247
AC:
30

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Fabry disease Uncertain:2Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 06, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaOct 13, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchAlbrecht-Kossel-Institute, Medical University RostockJan 01, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationBroad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardJan 22, 2020The p.Leu3Pro variant in GLA has not been previously reported in individuals with Fabry disease, and has been identified in 0.32% (61/19010) of African chromosomes, including 11 hemizygotes, and 0.0036% (1/28047) of Latino chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs150547672). This variant has been reported in ClinVar as benign by the Laboratory for Molecular Medicine (Partners Healthcare) and GeneDx, as likely benign by Invitae and Ambry Genetics, and as a VUS by Albrecht-Kossel-Institute (Medical University Rostock) and the Division of Genomic Diagnostics (The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia) (ID:42464). Computational prediction tools, including splice predictors, and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, although additional studies are required to fully establish its clinical significance, this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1, BP4 (Richards 2015). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 11, 2018- -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 30, 2018Variant summary: GLA c.8T>C (p.Leu3Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Two of four in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00027 in 200269 control chromosomes, predominantly observed within the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0029 in the gnomAD database, including 11 hemizygotes. This frequency is not higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in GLA causing Cardiomyopathy (0.0029 vs 0.0071). c.8T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Fabry disease (Lukas 2016), however in this study, authors found normal biomarker levels in these individuals. Experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function also showed normal (or somewhat elevated) activity for the variant protein (Lukas 2016). Five other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, with two laboratories classifying as "benign", two classifying as "likely benign", and one classifying as "VUS". Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJul 29, 2015p.Leu3Pro in exon 1 of GLA: This variant is not expected to have clinical signif icance because it has been identified in 0.3% (26/8444) of African chromosomes i ncluding 4 hemizygous males by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://ex ac.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs150547672). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 06, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioSep 28, 2020- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 27, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Migalastat response Other:1
drug response, no assertion criteria providedresearchAlbrecht-Kossel-Institute, Medical University RostockJan 01, 2014- Pharmacological Chaperone response: yes

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.055
CardioboostCm
Benign
0.051
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.17
Cadd
Benign
17
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.23
T;.
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.89
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.44
T;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.96
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.025
T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
2.0
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.64
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0040
D;.
Polyphen
0.0030
B;.
Vest4
0.76
MVP
0.82
MPC
2.2
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
1.3
Varity_R
0.25
gMVP
0.92

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150547672; hg19: chrX-100662884; API