rs150678035

Positions:

chr5-36970880-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The ENST00000282516.13(NIPBL):c.615G>A(p.Ser205=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000827 in 1,612,258 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00047 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00086 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NIPBL
ENST00000282516.13 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.578

Variant links:

Genes affected

NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

NIPBL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).

BP6

Variant 5-36970880-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-36970880-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 159178.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=4}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.578 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000468 (71/151730) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00078 (53/67922). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000613. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 29 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 71 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NIPBL	NM_133433.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.615G>A	p.Ser205=	synonymous_variant	7/47	ENST00000282516.13	NP_597677.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NIPBL	ENST00000282516.13 linkuse as main transcript	c.615G>A	p.Ser205=	synonymous_variant	7/47	1	NM_133433.4	ENSP00000282516	P1	Q6KC79-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000468

AC:

AN:

151614

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000218

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000526

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000780

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000482

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000538

AC:

135

AN:

251158

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000523

AC XY:

AN XY:

135748

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000260

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000817

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000864

AC:

1262

AN:

1460528

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000828

AC XY:

602

AN XY:

726658

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000101

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00108

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000663

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000468

AC:

AN:

151730

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000391

AC XY:

AN XY:

74146

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000218

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000525

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000780

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000477

Alfa

AF:

0.000851

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000548

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000981

EpiControl

AF:

0.00113

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Sep 13, 2016	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Nov 06, 2020	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Jan 01, 2024	NIPBL: BP4, BP7 -

Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 29, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jul 15, 2021	- -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Feb 08, 2013

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Dec 18, 2017

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.41

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.74

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over