rs150775371

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_003060.4(SLC22A5):c.1643G>A(p.Arg548Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00029 in 1,613,236 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R548G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SLC22A5
NM_003060.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.957

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SLC22A5 (HGNC:10969): (solute carrier family 22 member 5) Polyspecific organic cation transporters in the liver, kidney, intestine, and other organs are critical for elimination of many endogenous small organic cations as well as a wide array of drugs and environmental toxins. The encoded protein is a plasma integral membrane protein which functions both as an organic cation transporter and as a sodium-dependent high affinity carnitine transporter. The encoded protein is involved in the active cellular uptake of carnitine. Mutations in this gene are the cause of systemic primary carnitine deficiency (CDSP), an autosomal recessive disorder manifested early in life by hypoketotic hypoglycemia and acute metabolic decompensation, and later in life by skeletal myopathy or cardiomyopathy. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]

SLC22A5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

systemic primary carnitine deficiency disease
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health
short QT syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

SLC22A5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.033599883).

BP6

Variant 5-132394241-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132394241-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 460404.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SLC22A5	NM_003060.4 link	c.1643G>A	p.Arg548Lys	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 10	ENST00000245407.8	NP_003051.1	O76082-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SLC22A5	ENST00000245407.8 link	c.1643G>A	p.Arg548Lys	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 10	1	NM_003060.4	ENSP00000245407.3		O76082-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000204

AC:

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000188

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000382

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000219

AC:

AN:

251464

AF XY:

0.000221

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000139

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000422

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000299

AC:

437

AN:

1461040

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000277

AC XY:

201

AN XY:

726892

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000896

AC:

AN:

33466

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86238

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000374

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000373

AC:

414

AN:

1111228

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000298

AC:

AN:

60370

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.449

Heterozygous variant carriers

100

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000204

AC:

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000188

AC XY:

AN XY:

74352

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000724

AC:

AN:

41440

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15280

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5202

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000188

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000382

AC:

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000363

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000219

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000454

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000465

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000264

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000327

EpiControl

AF:

0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal carnitine transport defect

Uncertain:5Benign:2

Oct 22, 2022

Baylor Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 03, 2022

Giacomini Lab, University of California, San Francisco

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:in vitro;research

- -

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 04, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Jul 23, 2024

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Nov 18, 2019

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.069

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.37

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.45

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.87

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.080

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.66

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.47

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.72

LIST_S2

Benign

0.62

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.011

MetaRNN

Benign

0.034

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.99

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.0

N;.

PhyloP100

0.96

PrimateAI

Benign

0.27

PROVEAN

Benign

0.63

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.11

Sift

Benign

0.71

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.95

T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;.

Vest4

0.084

MVP

0.77

MPC

0.21

ClinPred

0.022

GERP RS

3.5

Varity_R

0.063

gMVP

0.41

Mutation Taster

=85/15

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over