rs150910683
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):āc.4914A>Gā(p.Pro1638=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000791 in 1,614,240 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0045 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00041 ( 4 hom. )
Consequence
CEP152
NM_001194998.2 synonymous
NM_001194998.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.09
Genes affected
CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 15-48738468-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48738468-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 158269.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-48738468-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.09 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00446 (679/152362) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0156 (649/41586). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0146. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 328 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP152 | NM_001194998.2 | c.4914A>G | p.Pro1638= | synonymous_variant | 27/27 | ENST00000380950.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP152 | ENST00000380950.7 | c.4914A>G | p.Pro1638= | synonymous_variant | 27/27 | 1 | NM_001194998.2 | A2 | |
CEP152 | ENST00000399334.7 | c.4746A>G | p.Pro1582= | synonymous_variant | 26/26 | 1 | P2 | ||
CEP152 | ENST00000561245.1 | c.142+3163A>G | intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00441 AC: 671AN: 152244Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
671
AN:
152244
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000978 AC: 244AN: 249430Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.000702 AC XY: 95AN XY: 135312
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
244
AN:
249430
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
95
AN XY:
135312
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000409 AC: 598AN: 1461878Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000364 AC XY: 265AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
598
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
265
AN XY:
727240
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00446 AC: 679AN: 152362Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00440 AC XY: 328AN XY: 74508
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
679
AN:
152362
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
328
AN XY:
74508
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 06, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 12, 2016 | - - |
Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Seckel syndrome 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at