rs16924241
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_033439.4(IL33):āc.789C>Gā(p.Ile263Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00193 in 1,613,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 56 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033439.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL33 | NM_033439.4 | c.789C>G | p.Ile263Met | missense_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000682010.1 | NP_254274.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL33 | ENST00000682010.1 | c.789C>G | p.Ile263Met | missense_variant | 8/8 | NM_033439.4 | ENSP00000507310.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0105 AC: 1595AN: 152008Hom.: 24 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00272 AC: 683AN: 250884Hom.: 16 AF XY: 0.00173 AC XY: 235AN XY: 135590
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00104 AC: 1513AN: 1460930Hom.: 32 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000892 AC XY: 648AN XY: 726786
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0105 AC: 1595AN: 152126Hom.: 24 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00995 AC XY: 740AN XY: 74370
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 12, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at