rs16961557
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000380950.7(CEP152):āc.3317T>Cā(p.Val1106Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00541 in 1,613,926 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 437 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000380950.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP152 | NM_001194998.2 | c.3317T>C | p.Val1106Ala | missense_variant | 20/27 | ENST00000380950.7 | NP_001181927.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP152 | ENST00000380950.7 | c.3317T>C | p.Val1106Ala | missense_variant | 20/27 | 1 | NM_001194998.2 | ENSP00000370337 | A2 | |
CEP152 | ENST00000399334.7 | c.3317T>C | p.Val1106Ala | missense_variant | 20/26 | 1 | ENSP00000382271 | P2 | ||
CEP152 | ENST00000325747.9 | c.3038T>C | p.Val1013Ala | missense_variant | 19/25 | 1 | ENSP00000321000 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0291 AC: 4420AN: 152132Hom.: 209 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00704 AC: 1755AN: 249410Hom.: 96 AF XY: 0.00525 AC XY: 710AN XY: 135326
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00294 AC: 4291AN: 1461676Hom.: 225 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00259 AC XY: 1883AN XY: 727152
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0292 AC: 4448AN: 152250Hom.: 212 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0290 AC XY: 2159AN XY: 74440
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Seckel syndrome 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at