rs16969927

Variant names:

• chr19-35033591-C-T
• rs16969927
• NM_001037.5:c.300C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_001037.5(SCN1B):​c.300C>T​(p.Asp100Asp) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000913 in 1,614,086 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0049 (7 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00050 (4 hom.)
• Consequence: SCN1B NM_001037.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 3.84

Genes affected

SCN1B (HGNC:10586): (sodium voltage-gated channel beta subunit 1) Voltage-gated sodium channels are heteromeric proteins that function in the generation and propagation of action potentials in muscle and neuronal cells. They are composed of one alpha and two beta subunits, where the alpha subunit provides channel activity and the beta-1 subunit modulates the kinetics of channel inactivation. This gene encodes a sodium channel beta-1 subunit. Mutations in this gene result in generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, Brugada syndrome 5, and defects in cardiac conduction. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.32).
• BP6: Variant 19-35033591-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-35033591-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138993.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-35033591-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00489 (744/152242) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0171 (711/41528). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0161. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 337 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 744 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SCN1B	NM_001037.5	c.300C>T	p.Asp100Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 6	ENST00000262631.11	NP_001028.1
SCN1B	NM_199037.5	c.300C>T	p.Asp100Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 3		NP_950238.1
SCN1B	NM_001321605.2	c.201C>T	p.Asp67Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 6		NP_001308534.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SCN1B	ENST00000262631.11	c.300C>T	p.Asp100Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 6	1	NM_001037.5	ENSP00000262631.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00487 AC: 741 AN: 152124 Hom.: 7 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0171

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00131

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000441

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00431

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00135 AC: 339 AN: 251396 Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000972 AC XY: 132 AN XY: 135864

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0190

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000809

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000163

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000499 AC: 729 AN: 1461844 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000419 AC XY: 305 AN XY: 727214

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0186

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000872

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000944

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00489 AC: 744 AN: 152242 Hom.: 7 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00453 AC XY: 337 AN XY: 74436

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0171

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00131

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00426

Alfa AF: 0.00278 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00581

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3

Oct 23, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The SCN1B c.300C>T (p.Asp100Asp) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide causing a synonymous change and 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 456/277158 (5 homozygotes) control chromosomes (gnomAD) at a frequency of 0.0016453, which is approximately 165 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SCN1B variant (0.00001), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Aug 28, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 15, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Brugada syndrome 5 Benign:2

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2

Apr 13, 2021

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 1 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

May 09, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.32
CADD	Benign	12
DANN	Benign	0.70
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs16969927; hg19: chr19-35524495;