rs17159287

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002047.4(GARS1):​c.1163G>A​(p.Arg388Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00158 in 1,614,150 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0078 ( 14 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00094 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

GARS1
NM_002047.4 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.06
Variant links:
Genes affected
GARS1 (HGNC:4162): (glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1) This gene encodes glycyl-tRNA synthetase, one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that charge tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded enzyme is an (alpha)2 dimer which belongs to the class II family of tRNA synthetases. It has been shown to be a target of autoantibodies in the human autoimmune diseases, polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0050005615).
BP6
Variant 7-30616027-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30616027-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 360012.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00778 (1185/152266) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0267 (1110/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0254. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 537 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1185 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GARS1NM_002047.4 linkc.1163G>A p.Arg388Gln missense_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENST00000389266.8 NP_002038.2 P41250-1
GARS1NM_001316772.1 linkc.1001G>A p.Arg334Gln missense_variant Exon 9 of 17 NP_001303701.1 P41250-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GARS1ENST00000389266.8 linkc.1163G>A p.Arg388Gln missense_variant Exon 9 of 17 1 NM_002047.4 ENSP00000373918.3 P41250-1
GARS1ENST00000675651.1 linkc.1163G>A p.Arg388Gln missense_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502513.1 A0A6Q8PGZ8
GARS1ENST00000675810.1 linkc.1061G>A p.Arg354Gln missense_variant Exon 8 of 16 ENSP00000502743.1 A0A6Q8PHH9
GARS1ENST00000675693.1 linkc.995G>A p.Arg332Gln missense_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502174.1 A0A6Q8PGA8
GARS1ENST00000675051.1 linkc.962G>A p.Arg321Gln missense_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502296.1 A0A6Q8PGI6
GARS1ENST00000674815.1 linkc.794G>A p.Arg265Gln missense_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502799.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000674851.1 linkc.794G>A p.Arg265Gln missense_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502451.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000444666.6 linkn.1163G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 18 3 ENSP00000415447.2 H7C443
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*877G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.*263G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 17 ENSP00000501636.1 A0A6Q8PF45
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.*501G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502464.1 A0A6Q8PGZ9
GARS1ENST00000674807.1 linkn.1163G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 16 ENSP00000502814.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*1033G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000675859.1 linkn.1163G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 15 ENSP00000502033.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*1105G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 11 of 19 ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.*108G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502571.1 A0A6Q8PH49
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.*614G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501986.1 A0A6Q8PFV5
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.*452G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502373.1 A0A6Q8PGN7
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.*595G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501980.1 A0A6Q8PFU7
GARS1ENST00000676403.1 linkn.1163G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 16 ENSP00000502681.1 A0A6Q8PHI7
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*877G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.*263G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 17 ENSP00000501636.1 A0A6Q8PF45
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.*501G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502464.1 A0A6Q8PGZ9
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*1033G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*1105G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 11 of 19 ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.*108G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502571.1 A0A6Q8PH49
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.*614G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501986.1 A0A6Q8PFV5
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.*452G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502373.1 A0A6Q8PGN7
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.*595G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501980.1 A0A6Q8PFU7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00781
AC:
1188
AN:
152148
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0268
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00717
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00219
AC:
546
AN:
249512
Hom.:
8
AF XY:
0.00167
AC XY:
226
AN XY:
135384
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0279
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000230
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00231
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000935
AC:
1367
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000813
AC XY:
591
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0284
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000104
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000135
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00224
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00778
AC:
1185
AN:
152266
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00721
AC XY:
537
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0267
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00710
Alfa
AF:
0.00164
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00841
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0213
AC:
82
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000363
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.00257
AC:
311
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Jan 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

GARS1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Mar 11, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 06, 2022
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2017
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 05, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Jul 17, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.055
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.49
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.87
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.085
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.51
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.28
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.75
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0050
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.26
N
REVEL
Benign
0.14
Sift
Benign
0.86
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.65
T
Polyphen
0.0020
B
Vest4
0.070
MVP
0.53
MPC
0.40
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
3.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2
Varity_R
0.20
gMVP
0.27

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17159287; hg19: chr7-30655643; API