rs17883862

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2_Supporting

The NM_001257387.2(CHEK2):c.-524C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000546 in 1,613,706 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0023 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00037 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_001257387.2 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:1B:23O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.336

Variant links:

Genes affected

CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

CHEK2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004856348).

BP6

Variant 22-28734468-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-28734468-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 5594.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-28734468-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr22-28734468-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHEK2	NM_007194.4 link	c.254C>T	p.Pro85Leu	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 15	ENST00000404276.6	NP_009125.1	O96017-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CHEK2	ENST00000404276.6 link	c.254C>T	p.Pro85Leu	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 15	1	NM_007194.4	ENSP00000385747.1		O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00226

AC:

344

AN:

152090

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00681

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00302

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000915

AC:

230

AN:

251444

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000684

AC XY:

AN XY:

135902

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00843

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000954

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00387

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000158

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000366

AC:

535

AN:

1461498

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000337

AC XY:

245

AN XY:

727072

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00753

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000895

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00414

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000639

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000977

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00227

AC:

346

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00220

AC XY:

164

AN XY:

74428

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00684

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00301

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.000980

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00270

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00704

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000882

AC:

107

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Benign:23Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:6Other:1

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 06, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 09, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Nov 27, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:6

Aug 09, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The CHEK2 c.254C>T (p.Pro85Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 2/3 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 143/130972 control chromosomes (1 homozygote) including ExAC, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.007411 (77/10390). This frequency is about 24 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CHEK2 variant (0.0003125), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. This variant has been reported in multiple breast cancer patients without clear evidence supporting causality. Although one functional study showed in vitro kinase actitiy of CHEK2 p.P85L was 40-50% of wild-type CHEK2, two additional functional studies showed this variant does not affect yeast growth rate or in vivo response to DNA damage. In addition, multiple clinical laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as likely benign. -

Dec 17, 2020

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2017

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast

Benign:4

Mar 09, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2016

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:4

Jun 20, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 08, 2014

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 14, 2017

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 24, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Bone osteosarcoma

Pathogenic:1

Jan 01, 2002

OMIM

Significance: Pathogenic

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

May 02, 2022

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CHEK2 p.Pro85Leu variant was identified in 31 of 5508 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.01) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was present in 31 of 6844 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from healthy individuals (Bell 2007, Shaag 2005, Le Calvez-Kelm 2011, Bodian 2014). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs17883862 as With Pathogenic, Uncertain significance allele), ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano, and Color Genomics and as likely benign by Counsyl and four other clinical laboratories) and the Zhejiang University Database (as neutral allele). The variant was not identified in Cosmic or MutDB. The variant was identified in control databases in 285 of 277140 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). This variant was observed in the following populations: African in 192 of 24018 chromosomes (freq: 0.008), Ashkenazi Jewish in 39 of 10152 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), Latino in 33 of 34416 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Other in 1 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 18 of 126662 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 2 of 30780 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), but not in the East Asian or Finnish populations. The p.Pro85 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predicts a greater than 10% difference in splicing. Several in vitro studies show DNA damage response by this variant is consistent with that of the wild-type protein (Nevanlinna 2006, Shaag 2005, Roeb 2012). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Apr 19, 2022

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.079

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.26

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.14

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.11

T;.;T;T;.;T;.;.;.;.;T;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.24

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.29

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.75

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.89

.;D;.;.;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.022

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0049

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.030

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.7

L;L;L;L;L;L;L;L;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.43

PROVEAN

Benign

0.10

N;N;N;N;N;.;N;N;N;N;D;.;D

REVEL

Benign

0.10

Sift

Benign

0.13

T;T;T;T;D;.;D;T;D;D;D;.;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.19

T;T;T;T;T;.;D;T;T;T;D;.;.

Polyphen

0.73

P;P;P;P;D;P;D;P;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.32

MVP

0.96

MPC

0.021

ClinPred

0.017

GERP RS

1.1

Varity_R

0.031

gMVP

0.26

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over