rs17883862
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.254C>T(p.Pro85Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000546 in 1,613,706 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P85H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007194.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.254C>T | p.Pro85Leu | missense_variant | 2/15 | ENST00000404276.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.254C>T | p.Pro85Leu | missense_variant | 2/15 | 1 | NM_007194.4 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00226 AC: 344AN: 152090Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000915 AC: 230AN: 251444Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000684 AC XY: 93AN XY: 135902
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000366 AC: 535AN: 1461498Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000337 AC XY: 245AN XY: 727072
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00227 AC: 346AN: 152208Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00220 AC XY: 164AN XY: 74428
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:5Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 06, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 27, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 09, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 09, 2017 | Variant summary: The CHEK2 c.254C>T (p.Pro85Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 2/3 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 143/130972 control chromosomes (1 homozygote) including ExAC, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.007411 (77/10390). This frequency is about 24 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CHEK2 variant (0.0003125), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. This variant has been reported in multiple breast cancer patients without clear evidence supporting causality. Although one functional study showed in vitro kinase actitiy of CHEK2 p.P85L was 40-50% of wild-type CHEK2, two additional functional studies showed this variant does not affect yeast growth rate or in vivo response to DNA damage. In addition, multiple clinical laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 17, 2020 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Apr 25, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 09, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Feb 14, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Aug 24, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 20, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 08, 2014 | - - |
Bone osteosarcoma Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jan 01, 2002 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 02, 2022 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The CHEK2 p.Pro85Leu variant was identified in 31 of 5508 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.01) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was present in 31 of 6844 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from healthy individuals (Bell 2007, Shaag 2005, Le Calvez-Kelm 2011, Bodian 2014). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs17883862 as With Pathogenic, Uncertain significance allele), ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano, and Color Genomics and as likely benign by Counsyl and four other clinical laboratories) and the Zhejiang University Database (as neutral allele). The variant was not identified in Cosmic or MutDB. The variant was identified in control databases in 285 of 277140 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). This variant was observed in the following populations: African in 192 of 24018 chromosomes (freq: 0.008), Ashkenazi Jewish in 39 of 10152 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), Latino in 33 of 34416 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Other in 1 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 18 of 126662 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 2 of 30780 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), but not in the East Asian or Finnish populations. The p.Pro85 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predicts a greater than 10% difference in splicing. Several in vitro studies show DNA damage response by this variant is consistent with that of the wild-type protein (Nevanlinna 2006, Shaag 2005, Roeb 2012). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at