rs1800014
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000311.5(PRNP):c.655G>A(p.Glu219Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.004 in 1,613,590 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 198 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000311.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRNP | NM_000311.5 | c.655G>A | p.Glu219Lys | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000379440.9 | NP_000302.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRNP | ENST00000379440.9 | c.655G>A | p.Glu219Lys | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_000311.5 | ENSP00000368752 | P1 | |
PRNP | ENST00000424424.2 | c.655G>A | p.Glu219Lys | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | ENSP00000411599 | P1 | ||
PRNP | ENST00000430350.2 | c.655G>A | p.Glu219Lys | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | ENSP00000399376 | P1 | ||
PRNP | ENST00000457586.2 | c.655G>A | p.Glu219Lys | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | ENSP00000415284 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00309 AC: 468AN: 151618Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00802 AC: 2016AN: 251398Hom.: 48 AF XY: 0.00934 AC XY: 1269AN XY: 135858
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00410 AC: 5987AN: 1461854Hom.: 180 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00515 AC XY: 3745AN XY: 727228
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00308 AC: 468AN: 151736Hom.: 18 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00420 AC XY: 311AN XY: 74124
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 05, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
RECLASSIFIED - VARIANT OF UNKNOWN SIGNIFICANCE Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Feb 01, 2012 | - - |
Inherited prion disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Huntington disease-like 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at