rs1800219

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):​c.4179C>T​(p.Ser1393Ser) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00171 in 1,614,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 24 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.77
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 17-50185847-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50185847-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 281778.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-50185847-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-50185847-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00295 (449/152308) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00952 (46/4830). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00734. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 211 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 449 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
COL1A1NM_000088.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4179C>T p.Ser1393Ser synonymous_variant 50/51 ENST00000225964.10 NP_000079.2 P02452
COL1A1XM_011524341.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3981C>T p.Ser1327Ser synonymous_variant 47/48 XP_011522643.1
COL1A1XM_005257058.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.3909C>T p.Ser1303Ser synonymous_variant 48/49 XP_005257115.2
COL1A1XM_005257059.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.3261C>T p.Ser1087Ser synonymous_variant 37/38 XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL1A1ENST00000225964.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.4179C>T p.Ser1393Ser synonymous_variant 50/511 NM_000088.4 ENSP00000225964.6 P02452
COL1A1ENST00000510710.3 linkuse as main transcriptn.1144C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/22

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00298
AC:
453
AN:
152190
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00717
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00164
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00972
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000911
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00288
AC:
724
AN:
251160
Hom.:
7
AF XY:
0.00336
AC XY:
456
AN XY:
135864
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00782
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0128
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000925
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00294
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00158
AC:
2306
AN:
1461862
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.00195
AC XY:
1419
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00857
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0126
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000510
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00242
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00295
AC:
449
AN:
152308
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00283
AC XY:
211
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00712
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00163
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00952
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000911
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.00221
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00303
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00635
AC:
22
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00174
EpiControl
AF:
0.00184

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 28, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 28, 2015- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2024COL1A1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 14, 2020- -
Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenMar 07, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenMay 01, 2020- -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Infantile cortical hyperostosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 12, 2019This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.97

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800219; hg19: chr17-48263208; API