rs1800305

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000152.5(GAA):​c.1374C>T​(p.Tyr458=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0689 in 1,613,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,799 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.097 ( 946 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.066 ( 3853 hom. )

Consequence

GAA
NM_000152.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.31
Variant links:
Genes affected
GAA (HGNC:4065): (alpha glucosidase) This gene encodes lysosomal alpha-glucosidase, which is essential for the degradation of glycogen to glucose in lysosomes. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple intermediate forms and the mature form of the enzyme. Defects in this gene are the cause of glycogen storage disease II, also known as Pompe's disease, which is an autosomal recessive disorder with a broad clinical spectrum. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 17-80109992-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80109992-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 92463.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-80109992-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.31 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.187 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
GAANM_000152.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1374C>T p.Tyr458= synonymous_variant 9/20 ENST00000302262.8 NP_000143.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GAAENST00000302262.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1374C>T p.Tyr458= synonymous_variant 9/201 NM_000152.5 ENSP00000305692 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0974
AC:
14825
AN:
152154
Hom.:
945
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.191
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0702
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0547
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0709
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0739
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0632
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.142
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0661
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0969
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0693
AC:
17332
AN:
250176
Hom.:
851
AF XY:
0.0692
AC XY:
9386
AN XY:
135584
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.196
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0456
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0719
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000817
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0890
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0603
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0652
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0800
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0659
AC:
96273
AN:
1460782
Hom.:
3853
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0667
AC XY:
48438
AN XY:
726722
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.202
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0489
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0713
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0863
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0622
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0626
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0724
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0974
AC:
14830
AN:
152272
Hom.:
946
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0962
AC XY:
7162
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.190
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0546
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0709
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0740
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0632
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0661
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0955
Alfa
AF:
0.0834
Hom.:
318
Bravo
AF:
0.100
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0420
AC:
148
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0689
EpiControl
AF:
0.0679

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 15, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 04, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Glycogen storage disease, type II Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Nov 21, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJun 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPhosphorus, Inc.Aug 01, 2017- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicFeb 27, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 01, 2019This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
0.21
DANN
Benign
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800305; hg19: chr17-78083791; API