rs1800309
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000152.5(GAA):c.2065G>A(p.Glu689Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0455 in 1,601,260 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,969 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign,other (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000152.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | NM_000152.5 | c.2065G>A | p.Glu689Lys | missense_variant | 15/20 | ENST00000302262.8 | NP_000143.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | ENST00000302262.8 | c.2065G>A | p.Glu689Lys | missense_variant | 15/20 | 1 | NM_000152.5 | ENSP00000305692.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0437 AC: 6657AN: 152194Hom.: 305 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0556 AC: 12525AN: 225448Hom.: 689 AF XY: 0.0556 AC XY: 6795AN XY: 122174
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0457 AC: 66223AN: 1448948Hom.: 2661 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0463 AC XY: 33325AN XY: 719752
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0438 AC: 6671AN: 152312Hom.: 308 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0456 AC XY: 3396AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glycogen storage disease, type II Benign:5Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | Jan 22, 2020 | The p.Glu689Lys variant in GAA has been reported as a benign and likely benign variant for Glycogen Storage Disease II in ClinVar (Variation ID: 4030). This variant has been identified in 5.490% (13805/251476) of chromosomes, including 757 homozygotes, by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs1800309). This variant has been seen in the general population at a frequency high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. It is a known pseudodeficiency allele that causes false-positive results in GAA deficiency enzyme assays (PMID: 20080426, 18301443). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign for Glycogen Storage Disease II in an autosomal recessive manner based on its frequency in the general population. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1 (Richards 2015). - |
other, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 07, 2019 | - pseudodeficiency allele |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Phosphorus, Inc. | Aug 01, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 10, 2012 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network | - | Variant reported in multiple Invitae PIN participants. Variant interpreted as Benign (Pseudo deficiency allele) most recently on 9/29/2020 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Dec 16, 2015 | - - |
Acid alpha-glucosidase, allele 4 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, flagged submission | literature only | OMIM | Sep 01, 1996 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 11, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at