rs1800315
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The highest continental population minor allele frequency for c.2780C>T (p.Thr927Ile) in gnomAD v2.1.1 is 0.1317 in the African population. This is higher than the ClinGen LSD VCEP’s BA1 threshold (>0.01), therefore meeting the BA1 criterion. There is a ClinVar entry for this variant (Variation ID: 92482; 2 star review status) with six submitters classifying the variant as benign, and two as likely benign. In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as benign for Pompe disease. GAA-specific ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen LSD VCEP: BA1. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA145778/MONDO:0009290/010
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000152.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | NM_000152.5 | c.2780C>T | p.Thr927Ile | missense_variant | 19/20 | ENST00000302262.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | ENST00000302262.8 | c.2780C>T | p.Thr927Ile | missense_variant | 19/20 | 1 | NM_000152.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0423 AC: 6434AN: 152174Hom.: 363 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0188 AC: 4712AN: 250594Hom.: 209 AF XY: 0.0183 AC XY: 2481AN XY: 135606
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0103 AC: 15039AN: 1461080Hom.: 484 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0110 AC XY: 7984AN XY: 726834
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0423 AC: 6448AN: 152292Hom.: 363 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0420 AC XY: 3130AN XY: 74478
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 13, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 10, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Glycogen storage disease, type II Benign:5
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Lysosomal Storage Disorder Variant Curation Expert Panel | Jan 23, 2020 | The highest continental population minor allele frequency for c.2780C>T (p.Thr927Ile) in gnomAD v2.1.1 is 0.1317 in the African population. This is higher than the ClinGen LSD VCEP's BA1 threshold (>0.01), therefore meeting the BA1 criterion. There is a ClinVar entry for this variant (Variation ID: 92482; 2 star review status) with six submitters classifying the variant as benign, and two as likely benign. In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as benign for Pompe disease. GAA-specific ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen LSD VCEP: BA1. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Phosphorus, Inc. | Aug 01, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | May 17, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 19, 2020 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at