Menu
GeneBe

rs1800730

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 2P and 12B. PM1BP4_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000410.4(HFE):c.193A>T(p.Ser65Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0136 in 1,614,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 195 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 12 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.014 ( 183 hom. )

Consequence

HFE
NM_000410.4 missense

Scores

10
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:2U:10B:3O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.10
Variant links:
Genes affected
HFE (HGNC:4886): (homeostatic iron regulator) The protein encoded by this gene is a membrane protein that is similar to MHC class I-type proteins and associates with beta2-microglobulin (beta2M). It is thought that this protein functions to regulate iron absorption by regulating the interaction of the transferrin receptor with transferrin. The iron storage disorder, hereditary haemochromatosis, is a recessive genetic disorder that results from defects in this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
H2BC4 (HGNC:4757): (H2B clustered histone 4) Histones are basic nuclear proteins that are responsible for the nucleosome structure of the chromosomal fiber in eukaryotes. Two molecules of each of the four core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) form an octamer, around which approximately 146 bp of DNA is wrapped in repeating units, called nucleosomes. The linker histone, H1, interacts with linker DNA between nucleosomes and functions in the compaction of chromatin into higher order structures. The protein has antibacterial and antifungal antimicrobial activity. The main transcript variant of this gene is intronless and encodes a replication-dependent histone that is a member of the histone H2B family. This transcript variant lacks a polyA tail but instead contains a palindromic termination element. This gene is found in the large histone gene cluster on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

PM1
In a region_of_interest Alpha-1 (size 91) in uniprot entity HFE_HUMAN there are 7 pathogenic changes around while only 3 benign (70%) in NM_000410.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01902759).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00995 (1515/152208) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0154 (1044/68008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0146. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 756 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 12 AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
HFENM_000410.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.193A>T p.Ser65Cys missense_variant 2/6 ENST00000357618.10
HFE-AS1NR_144383.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.78T>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
HFEENST00000357618.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.193A>T p.Ser65Cys missense_variant 2/61 NM_000410.4 P3Q30201-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00997
AC:
1516
AN:
152090
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0264
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00668
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00260
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0154
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00526
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0102
AC:
2575
AN:
251490
Hom.:
24
AF XY:
0.0101
AC XY:
1369
AN XY:
135920
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00234
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00489
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0217
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0103
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0140
AC:
20501
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
183
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0137
AC XY:
9989
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00474
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00306
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000997
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0228
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0163
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0111
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00995
AC:
1515
AN:
152208
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0102
AC XY:
756
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00289
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00667
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00260
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000830
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0188
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0154
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00520
Alfa
AF:
0.0136
Hom.:
11
Bravo
AF:
0.00887
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0135
AC:
50
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0138
AC:
53
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00318
AC:
14
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0151
AC:
130
ExAC
AF:
0.0101
AC:
1225
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:2Uncertain:10Benign:3Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hemochromatosis type 1 Pathogenic:2Uncertain:2Other:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMApr 15, 1999- -
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBlueprint GeneticsNov 11, 2014- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGeneReviews-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJul 27, 2017The HFE c.193A>T (p.Ser65Cys) variant is a missense variant that has been reported to be enriched in individuals affected with hereditary hemochromatosis as compared to unaffected individuals in two studies (Mura et al. 1999; Holmstrom et al. 2002). The authors suggested that the p.Ser65Cys variant is associated with a mild phenotype, resulting in a lower degree of iron overload as compared to common pathogenic variants in the HFE gene. Two functional studies have reported that the p.Ser65Cys variant alone has no significant influence on iron status markers (Pedersen et al. 2009; Aranda et al. 2010), and Bacon et al. (2011) and Alves et al. (2016) discuss that the p.Ser65Cys variant is generally not associated with iron loading unless seen in a compound heterozygous state with either the p.Cys282Tyr or p.His63Asp variant. The p.Ser65Cys variant is reported at a frequency of 0.03846 in the British of England and Scotland population of the 1000 Genomes Project, which is consistent with estimates of disease prevalence and penetrance. Although p.Ser65Cys variant is widely reported in the literature as the third most common variant associated with HFE-related hereditary hemochromatosis (Seckington et al. 2015), the functional evidence suggests that this variant may not contribute to the mechanism of disease. Based on this conflicting evidence, the p.Ser65Cys is classified as a variant of unknown significance but suspicious for pathogenicity for hereditary hemochromatosis. This variant was observed by ICSL as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterDec 07, 2021_x000D_This variant was identified as compound heterozygous with NM_000410.4:c.845G>A. Criteria applied: PM3, PP3, BS3_SUP -
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 19, 2018This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10792295, 31664448, 31016714, 31028937, 29431110, 12377814, 28280078, 10194428, 19159930, 16132052, 10660483, 20301613, 27221532, 27173269, 26153218, 20107990, 21452290, 18542962, 17124037, 11336458, 27153395, 20981092, 19271219, 19681031) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 30, 2022The p.Ser65Cys has been reported as a normal variant in the European population, has also been described as a susceptibility allele in patients with iron overload, particularly in association with heavy alcohol consumption,but no evidence has ever been provided to support a causative role in HH. Therefore, neither testing nor reporting the presence of p.Ser65Cys is recommended in the diagnosis of HFE-related HH (EMQN best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) PMID: 26153218). Also: A third HFE genotype, known as type 1c, is related to the mutation Ser65Cys. The Ser65Cys mutation may lead to increased serum iron and ferritin levels but has not been associated with excess tissue iron stores and can, therefore, be considered a polymorphism without clinical significance (ACG Clinical Guideline: Hereditary Hemochromatosis). The Ser65Cys mutation is less common than either C282Y or H63D, with a heterozygote frequency of about 2% among whites (113,114). This mutation appears to have a modest effect on iron metabolism in the presence of the C282Y mutation, but iron overload–related disease has not been reported in C282Y/S65C compound heterozygotes. Neither the homozygous nor the heterozygous H63D or S65C mutation is a cause of pathologic iron overload. (PMID: 31335359). Furthermore, in this batch, the variant is detected in the heterozygous state in an individual who does not carry the C282Y variant. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024HFE: BS1, BS2 -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The HFE c.193A>T (p.Ser65Cys) variant was identified in the literature in multiple studies investigating the relationship between HFE variants and hemochromatosis or iron overload. A study of 711 patients with hemochromatosis found that the S65C variant was enriched in individuals with hemochromatosis in the absence of the two classical hemochromatosis variants (C282Y and H63D), with an affected frequency of 0.078 and a control frequency of 0.025. This study suggested that the S65C variant is associated with a mild form of hemochromatosis (Mura_1999_PMID:10194428). The p.S65C variant was also found in 14/296 patients with iron overload (freq=0.024) and 8/250 healthy controls (freq=0.016), suggesting that the variant may contribute to mild iron overload (Holmstrom_2002_PMID: 12377814). However, more recent studies have disputed the role of the S65C variant in hemochromatosis and iron status. A study of HFE polymorphisms in a Spanish Mediterranean population and another study of 6,020 Danish men both found no effect of the S65C variant on iron status (Aranda_2010_PMID: 20107990; Pedersen_2009_PMID:19159930). This variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1800730), ClinVar (classified as a VUS by Invitae and Illumina and as pathogenic by Blueprint Genetics for hereditary hemochromatosis) and LOVD 3.0, but was not reported in Cosmic. The variant was identified in control databases in 2891 of 282878 chromosomes (24 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.01022 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (Finnish) in 537 of 25120 chromosomes (freq: 0.02138), European (non-Finnish) in 1977 of 129196 chromosomes (freq: 0.0153), Other in 72 of 7226 chromosomes (freq: 0.009964), Latino in 173 of 35440 chromosomes (freq: 0.004881), Ashkenazi Jewish in 35 of 10370 chromosomes (freq: 0.003375), African in 63 of 24958 chromosomes (freq: 0.002524), South Asian in 30 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.00098), and East Asian in 4 of 19952 chromosomes (freq: 0.000201). The p.Ser65 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance, however we would suggest that this variant may be a risk factor for hemochromatosis. -
not specified Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 26, 2021Variant summary: HFE c.193A>T (p.Ser65Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the MHC class I-like antigen recognition-like domain (IPR011161) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.01 in 251490 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in HFE causing Hemochromatosis Type 1 (0.01 vs 0.046), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.193A>T has been reported in association with Hemochromatosis Type 1 in at least one published study, in which the variant was enriched in individuals affected with Hemochromatosis who did not have two alleles with some combination of the more common disease mutations p.C282Y and p.H63D (e.g. Mura_1999). This data suggested a possibly pathogenic role for the p.S65C variant. However, the variant has also been found in compound heterozygosity with these other disease variants in controls, and additional studies did not find association of the variant with the Hemochromatosis phenotype (e.g. Arya_1999, Oliveira_2009, Pedersen_2009). At least one publication reported an association for the variant with mild to moderate changes in serum ferritin and/or transferrin levels in indivduals who were compound heterozygotes for this variant and one of the common disease variants, however these individuals did not have clinical symptoms of iron load typically found in patients diagnosed with Hemochromatosis Type 1 (e.g. Holmstrom_2002). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hemochromatosis Type 1. To our knowledge, no conclusive experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) have cited the variant as uncertain significance (n=4) and likely pathogenic (n=1). Based on the majority concordance in its classification among peers in the field supported by the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance until additional information becomes available. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalFeb 06, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 04, 2022- -
HFE-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 20, 2024The HFE c.193A>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ser65Cys. Reports have indicated that the c.193A>T variant may be involved in a mild form of hemochromatosis (Mura et al. 1999. PubMed ID: 10194428; Holmström et al. 2002. PubMed ID: 12377814). However, a different study found no significant changes in ferritin levels in individuals with the p.Ser65Cys variant, even in presence of a corresponding p.Cys282Tyr or p.His63Asp variant (Pedersen and Milman. 2009. PubMed ID: 19159930). This variant has conflicting interpretations ranging from benign to uncertain in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/11/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Alzheimer disease;C0162532:Variegate porphyria;C0268323:Familial porphyria cutanea tarda;C2673520:Microvascular complications of diabetes, susceptibility to, 7;C3280096:Transferrin serum level quantitative trait locus 2;C3469186:Hemochromatosis type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Variegate porphyria;C0268323:Familial porphyria cutanea tarda;C1863052:Alzheimer disease type 1;C2673520:Microvascular complications of diabetes, susceptibility to, 7;C3280096:Transferrin serum level quantitative trait locus 2;C3469186:Hemochromatosis type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoMar 30, 2021HFE NM_000410.3 exon 2 p.Ser65Cys (c.193A>T): This variant has been reported in the literature in the heterozygous or compound heterozygous state in several individuals with hemochromatosis and is reported to be enriched in this population compared to controls (Mura 1999 PMID:10194428, Holstrom 2002 PMID:12377814). However, additional studies did not find this association (Arya 1999 PMID:10660483, Pendersen 2009 PMID:19159930). Some authors suggest that this variant may act as a risk allele or low penetrance variant when in trans with the Cys282Tyr or His63Asp variants (Wallace 2002 PMID:11943417, Le Gac 2005 PMID:16132052). This variant is also present in 1% (2891/282878) of total alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database, including 24 homozygotes (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/6-26091185-A-T). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:11). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools suggest that this variant may impact the protein. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -
Hereditary hemochromatosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.28
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.094
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.11
Cadd
Uncertain
25
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Uncertain
0.55
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.47
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.72
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.019
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.65
D
MutationTaster
Benign
0.69
A;A;A;A;A;A;A;A;A;A;A
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.55
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.99
D;D;D;D;D;D;.
Vest4
0.32
MPC
0.82
ClinPred
0.071
T
GERP RS
4.1
Varity_R
0.79
gMVP
0.92

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800730; hg19: chr6-26091185; API