rs180177317
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_012203.2(GRHPR):c.735-1G>A variant causes a splice acceptor, intron change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,708 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_012203.2 splice_acceptor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRHPR | NM_012203.2 | c.735-1G>A | splice_acceptor_variant, intron_variant | Intron 7 of 8 | ENST00000318158.11 | NP_036335.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251356Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135852
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461708Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727160
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary hyperoxaluria, type II Pathogenic:7
- -
- -
Variant summary: GRHPR c.735-1G>A is located in a canonical splice-site and is predicted to affect mRNA splicing resulting in a significantly altered protein due to either exon skipping, shortening, or inclusion of intronic material. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Four predict the variant abolishes a 3' acceptor site. Three predict the variant creates a new cryptic exonic 3' acceptor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 251356 control chromosomes (gnomAD). c.735-1G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 2 (example, Webster_2000, Pinapala_2017). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 14987413, 28553045, 11030416). Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 (Likely pathogenic, n=2; Pathogenic, n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic. -
The splice acceptor variant c.735-1G>A in the GRHPR gene which is located in a canonical splice-site has been reported previously in individuals affected with primary hyperoxaluria (Danpure et al., 2004; Pinapala et al., 2017). This sequence change affects an acceptor splice site in intron 7 of the GRHPR gene. This variant is reported with the allele frequency (0.001%) in the gnomAD Exomes. It is submitted to ClinVar as Likely Pathogenic/Pathogenic. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
- -
- -
- -
not provided Pathogenic:1
This sequence change affects an acceptor splice site in intron 7 of the GRHPR gene. It is expected to disrupt RNA splicing. Variants that disrupt the donor or acceptor splice site typically lead to a loss of protein function (PMID: 16199547), and loss-of-function variants in GRHPR are known to be pathogenic (PMID: 25644115). This variant is present in population databases (rs180177317, gnomAD 0.01%). Disruption of this splice site has been observed in individuals with GRHPR-related conditions (PMID: 11030416, 28553045). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 204244). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at