rs1805321
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000535.7(PMS2):c.1408C>T(p.Pro470Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.399 in 1,613,638 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 130,152 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000535.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMS2 | NM_000535.7 | c.1408C>T | p.Pro470Ser | missense_variant | 11/15 | ENST00000265849.12 | NP_000526.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMS2 | ENST00000265849.12 | c.1408C>T | p.Pro470Ser | missense_variant | 11/15 | 1 | NM_000535.7 | ENSP00000265849 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.372 AC: 56479AN: 151820Hom.: 10845 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.388 AC: 97518AN: 251474Hom.: 19196 AF XY: 0.391 AC XY: 53079AN XY: 135908
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.402 AC: 587541AN: 1461700Hom.: 119298 Cov.: 49 AF XY: 0.403 AC XY: 292826AN XY: 727146
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.372 AC: 56519AN: 151938Hom.: 10854 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.368 AC XY: 27349AN XY: 74280
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 16, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 20, 2017 | p.Pro470Ser in Exon 11 of PMS2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 45% (4560/10152) of Ashkenazi Jewis h chromosomes and 41% (52732/126656) of European chromosomes by the Genome Aggre gation Database (GnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs1805321). - |
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | May 10, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 06, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | IntelligeneCG | Aug 18, 2017 | - - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 22, 2011 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | MAF >1% - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 30, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 14, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 05, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 06, 2021 | - - |
Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Oct 25, 2021 | - - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Pathway Genomics | Jul 24, 2014 | - - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PMS2 p.Pro470Ser variant was identified in 464 of 1592 chromosomes (frequency: 0.294) from individuals with colorectal and/or endometrial cancer, suspected HNPCC and artherosclerosis (Borras_2013_2370975, Clendenning_2006_16619239, Gururangan_2008_17993636, He_2011_21984973, Hendriks_2006_16472587, Johnston_2012_22703879_supplementary, Kim_2004_15448003); however, control chromosomes were not analyzed in all of the studies, thus the prevalence of the variant in the general population could not be determined. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1805321) “With benign allele”, MutDB, and InSiGHT Colon Cancer DB. The variant was listed in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project in 3620 of 8600 European American alleles (frequency: 0.421) and in 1242 of 4856 African American alleles (frequency:0.256), increasing the likelihood that it may be a polymorphism in certain populations. The p.Pro470Ser variant is not conserved/conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. This variant is unlikely to have an effect on splicing as it is downstream of the exon/intron junction. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at