rs181748854

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):​c.581G>A​(p.Arg194Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000268 in 1,607,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000024 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.25
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.017880768).
BP6
Variant 2-214781293-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214781293-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142942.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BARD1NM_000465.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.581G>A p.Arg194Lys missense_variant 4/11 ENST00000260947.9 NP_000456.2 Q99728-1A0AVN2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BARD1ENST00000260947.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.581G>A p.Arg194Lys missense_variant 4/111 NM_000465.4 ENSP00000260947.4 Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152084
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000197
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000163
AC:
4
AN:
244820
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000151
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
132098
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000600
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000179
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
35
AN:
1455000
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000263
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
723276
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000138
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000234
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000499
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152202
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000537
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000142
Hom.:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 25, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 31, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 01, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BARD1 p.Arg194Lys variant was identified in 2 of 7838 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0003) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (Tung 2016, Ramus 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs181748854) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics; as uncertain significance by Invitae and GeneDx). The variant was identified in control databases in 6 of 270676 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000022 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 1 of 33390 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), European in 5 of 124528 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004); it was not observed in the African, Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Arg194 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 12, 2024In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Published functional studies demonstrate activity similar to wild type in a homologous directed repair (HDR) assay (PMID: 30925164); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26315354, 26976419, 31371347, 33471991, 30925164) -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpNov 24, 2023This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 194 of the BARD1 protein (p.Arg194Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs181748854, gnomAD 0.004%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 26976419, 31371347). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142942). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The lysine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BARD1 function (PMID: 30925164). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Jul 22, 2024This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 14, 2022Variant summary: BARD1 c.581G>A (p.Arg194Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2e-05 in 251682 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.581G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer without strong evidence for causality (Toh_2019, Tung_2016) and unaffected controls (Dorling_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. In BARD1 variant homology-directed repair (HDR) assays, the variant was found to be functional (Adamovich_2019). Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as benign (n=1), likely benign (n=1) and VUS (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.065
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.32
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
0.090
DANN
Benign
0.50
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.057
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.3
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.023
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.46
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.026
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.018
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.97
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.60
N;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.25
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Benign
0.82
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.64
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.
Vest4
0.019
MVP
0.62
MPC
0.076
ClinPred
0.0082
T
GERP RS
-0.81
Varity_R
0.028
gMVP
0.16

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs181748854; hg19: chr2-215646017; API