Menu
GeneBe

rs183682756

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_001277115.2(DNAH11):c.8072A>G(p.Gln2691Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000245 in 1,613,982 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q2691K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00023 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH11
NM_001277115.2 missense

Scores

1
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.10
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH11 (HGNC:2942): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 11) This gene encodes a ciliary outer dynein arm protein and is a member of the dynein heavy chain family. It is a microtubule-dependent motor ATPase and has been reported to be involved in the movement of respiratory cilia. Mutations in this gene have been implicated in causing Kartagener Syndrome (a combination of situs inversus totalis and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD), also called Immotile Cilia Syndrome 1 (ICS1)) and male sterility. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03139767).
BP6
Variant 7-21742084-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-21742084-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 525225.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000247 (361/1461644) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00555 (32/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00404. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 171 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAH11NM_001277115.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.8072A>G p.Gln2691Arg missense_variant 49/82 ENST00000409508.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAH11ENST00000409508.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.8072A>G p.Gln2691Arg missense_variant 49/825 NM_001277115.2 P1
DNAH11ENST00000605912.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.474+2411A>G intron_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000230
AC:
35
AN:
152220
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000233
AC:
58
AN:
249084
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000244
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
135126
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000580
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000994
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000301
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000496
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000247
AC:
361
AN:
1461644
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000235
AC XY:
171
AN XY:
727112
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000827
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000268
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000778
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000230
AC:
35
AN:
152338
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000215
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000240
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.000405
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000378
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000121
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000223
AC:
27
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 10, 2019This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 7 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 20, 2022- -
DNAH11-related condition Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 01, 2023The DNAH11 c.8072A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Gln2691Arg. This variant has been reported in the heterozygous state or along with a second DNAH11 variant in individuals with primary ciliary dyskinesia or chronic respiratory disease (Sherman et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32662935; Alsamri et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32662942; Alsamri et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 34768622; Shoemark et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 35728977). This variant is reported in 0.057% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024DNAH11: PM2:Supporting, BP4 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.079
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.39
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
Cadd
Benign
18
Dann
Benign
0.97
Eigen
Benign
-0.25
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.49
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0091
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.031
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.97
D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
Vest4
0.21
MVP
0.38
ClinPred
0.033
T
GERP RS
4.3
Varity_R
0.18
gMVP
0.21

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs183682756; hg19: chr7-21781702; API