rs183683592

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):c.6826-6A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00134 in 1,612,720 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/2 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00087 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SYNE1
NM_182961.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0001131

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0600

Variant links:

Genes affected

SYNE1 (HGNC:17089): (spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1) This gene encodes a spectrin repeat containing protein expressed in skeletal and smooth muscle, and peripheral blood lymphocytes, that localizes to the nuclear membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 8, also referred to as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 or recessive ataxia of Beauce. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

SYNE1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).

BP6

Variant 6-152401347-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-152401347-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 197576.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr6-152401347-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 132 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SYNE1	NM_182961.4 link	c.6826-6A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 46 of 145	ENST00000367255.10	NP_892006.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SYNE1	ENST00000367255.10 link	c.6826-6A>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 46 of 145	1	NM_182961.4	ENSP00000356224.5	Q8NF91-1
SYNE1	ENST00000423061.6 link	c.6847-6A>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 46 of 145	1		ENSP00000396024.1	A0A0C4DG40
SYNE1	ENST00000461872.6 link	n.7044-6A>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 44 of 54	1
SYNE1	ENST00000535081.1 link	n.523-6A>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 3 of 3	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000867

AC:

132

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00141

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000756

AC:

189

AN:

250104

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000739

AC XY:

100

AN XY:

135256

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000521

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000476

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00143

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000656

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00139

AC:

2026

AN:

1460388

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00134

AC XY:

976

AN XY:

726582

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000239

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000604

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000134

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00174

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000795

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000867

AC:

132

AN:

152332

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000779

AC XY:

AN XY:

74482

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000337

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00141

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000946

Alfa

AF:

0.00125

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000979

EpiCase

AF:

0.00180

EpiControl

AF:

0.00130

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

SYNE1: BP4 -

Mar 01, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 14, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Aug 22, 2024

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.73

CADD

Benign

7.8

DANN

Benign

0.75

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00011

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0080

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over