rs184262608
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001164508.2(NEB):c.6069G>A(p.Met2023Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00826 in 1,596,242 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 74 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164508.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | NM_001164507.2 | c.6069G>A | p.Met2023Ile | missense_variant | 47/182 | ENST00000427231.7 | NP_001157979.2 | |
NEB | NM_001164508.2 | c.6069G>A | p.Met2023Ile | missense_variant | 47/182 | ENST00000397345.8 | NP_001157980.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.6069G>A | p.Met2023Ile | missense_variant | 47/182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505 | P5 | |
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.6069G>A | p.Met2023Ile | missense_variant | 47/182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578 | A2 | |
NEB | ENST00000409198.5 | c.6069G>A | p.Met2023Ile | missense_variant | 47/150 | 5 | ENSP00000386259 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00649 AC: 987AN: 152126Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00642 AC: 1598AN: 248750Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00640 AC XY: 864AN XY: 134922
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00845 AC: 12198AN: 1443998Hom.: 66 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00828 AC XY: 5958AN XY: 719402
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00648 AC: 987AN: 152244Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00652 AC XY: 485AN XY: 74428
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 12, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 03, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 07, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | NEB: BS1, BS2 - |
Nemaline myopathy 2 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at