rs186596886

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_198253.3(TERT):c.1392C>T(p.Phe464Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000543 in 1,587,594 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 1 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00057 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

TERT
NM_198253.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.113

Variant links:

Genes affected

TERT (HGNC:11730): (telomerase reverse transcriptase) Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein polymerase that maintains telomere ends by addition of the telomere repeat TTAGGG. The enzyme consists of a protein component with reverse transcriptase activity, encoded by this gene, and an RNA component which serves as a template for the telomere repeat. Telomerase expression plays a role in cellular senescence, as it is normally repressed in postnatal somatic cells resulting in progressive shortening of telomeres. Deregulation of telomerase expression in somatic cells may be involved in oncogenesis. Studies in mouse suggest that telomerase also participates in chromosomal repair, since de novo synthesis of telomere repeats may occur at double-stranded breaks. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms of telomerase reverse transcriptase have been identified; the full-length sequence of some variants has not been determined. Alternative splicing at this locus is thought to be one mechanism of regulation of telomerase activity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TERT links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).

BP6

Variant 5-1293494-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-1293494-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 242217.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-1293494-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.113 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000243 (37/152350) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00518 (25/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0036. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 23 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 12 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TERT	NM_198253.3 link	c.1392C>T	p.Phe464Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 16	ENST00000310581.10	NP_937983.2	O14746-1
TERT	NM_001193376.3 link	c.1392C>T	p.Phe464Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 15		NP_001180305.1	O14746-3
TERT	NR_149162.3 link	n.1471C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 13
TERT	NR_149163.3 link	n.1471C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 13

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TERT	ENST00000310581.10 link	c.1392C>T	p.Phe464Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 16	1	NM_198253.3	ENSP00000309572.5	O14746-1
TERT	ENST00000334602.10 link	c.1392C>T	p.Phe464Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 15	1		ENSP00000334346.6	O14746-3
TERT	ENST00000460137.6 link	n.1392C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 13	1		ENSP00000425003.1	O14746-4
TERT	ENST00000656021.1 link	n.1392C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 17			ENSP00000499759.1	A0A590UK92

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000243

AC:

AN:

152232

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00517

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00117

AC:

231

AN:

196640

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00149

AC XY:

159

AN XY:

106844

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000345

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000444

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000705

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00813

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000830

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000595

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000575

AC:

825

AN:

1435244

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000837

AC XY:

596

AN XY:

711884

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000247

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000352

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000262

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00855

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000446

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000691

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000243

AC:

AN:

152350

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000309

AC XY:

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000240

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00518

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000246

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000128

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

May 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TERT: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Oct 31, 2018

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aplastic anemia

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 9

Benign:1

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis;C3151443:Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2

Benign:1

Feb 01, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Dyskeratosis congenita

Benign:1

Jan 22, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Acute myeloid leukemia

Benign:1

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.57

CADD

Benign

3.3

DANN

Benign

0.58

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over