Menu
GeneBe

rs186999445

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):c.676-6A>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000527 in 1,613,818 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000044 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BMPR1A
NM_004329.3 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.000007345
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.741
Variant links:
Genes affected
BMPR1A (HGNC:1076): (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A) The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors are a family of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases that include the type I receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B and the type II receptor BMPR2. These receptors are also closely related to the activin receptors, ACVR1 and ACVR2. The ligands of these receptors are members of the TGF-beta superfamily. TGF-betas and activins transduce their signals through the formation of heteromeric complexes with 2 different types of serine (threonine) kinase receptors: type I receptors of about 50-55 kD and type II receptors of about 70-80 kD. Type II receptors bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they require their respective type I receptors for signaling, whereas type I receptors require their respective type II receptors for ligand binding. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BP6
Variant 10-86917128-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86917128-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136053.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000138 (21/152208) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00111 (17/15264). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000709. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 11 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 21 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BMPR1ANM_004329.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.676-6A>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant ENST00000372037.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BMPR1AENST00000372037.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.676-6A>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_004329.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152090
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00112
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000916
AC:
23
AN:
251144
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000118
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
135740
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000298
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000438
AC:
64
AN:
1461610
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000481
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
727112
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000268
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000297
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152208
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000148
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74410
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000164
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000174
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 24, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 18, 2019- -
Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylFeb 25, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaDec 10, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJun 13, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 09, 2022- -
Juvenile polyposis syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 02, 2023This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. -
BMPR1A-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 10, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 15, 2016Variant summary: The BMPR1A c.676-6A>C variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. Mutation taster predicts a benign outcome for this substitution along with 5/5 splice prediction tools predicting the variant not to have an impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 14/118044 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the Latino subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0002616 (3/11468). This frequency greatly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BMPR1A variant (0.000002), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of Latino origin. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.90
Cadd
Benign
0.031
Dann
Benign
0.37

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0000073
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs186999445; hg19: chr10-88676885; API