Menu
GeneBe

rs1881421

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004304.5(ALK):c.4587C>G(p.Asp1529Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.4 in 1,613,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 137,955 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D1529N) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.48 ( 18503 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.39 ( 119452 hom. )

Consequence

ALK
NM_004304.5 missense

Scores

13

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:1B:14O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.102
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALK (HGNC:427): (ALK receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, which belongs to the insulin receptor superfamily. This protein comprises an extracellular domain, an hydrophobic stretch corresponding to a single pass transmembrane region, and an intracellular kinase domain. It plays an important role in the development of the brain and exerts its effects on specific neurons in the nervous system. This gene has been found to be rearranged, mutated, or amplified in a series of tumours including anaplastic large cell lymphomas, neuroblastoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. The chromosomal rearrangements are the most common genetic alterations in this gene, which result in creation of multiple fusion genes in tumourigenesis, including ALK (chromosome 2)/EML4 (chromosome 2), ALK/RANBP2 (chromosome 2), ALK/ATIC (chromosome 2), ALK/TFG (chromosome 3), ALK/NPM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/SQSTM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/KIF5B (chromosome 10), ALK/CLTC (chromosome 17), ALK/TPM4 (chromosome 19), and ALK/MSN (chromosome X).[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
CLIP4 (HGNC:26108): (CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein family member 4) Predicted to enable microtubule plus-end binding activity. Predicted to be involved in cytoplasmic microtubule organization. Located in intracellular membrane-bounded organelle. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.4798009E-6).
BP6
Variant 2-29193500-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-29193500-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 133476.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-29193500-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.716 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ALKNM_004304.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.4587C>G p.Asp1529Glu missense_variant 29/29 ENST00000389048.8
ALKNM_001353765.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1383C>G p.Asp461Glu missense_variant 10/10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ALKENST00000389048.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.4587C>G p.Asp1529Glu missense_variant 29/291 NM_004304.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.475
AC:
72103
AN:
151896
Hom.:
18456
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.616
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.567
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.549
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.316
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.735
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.467
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.496
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.275
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.358
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.453
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.468
AC:
117649
AN:
251122
Hom.:
30306
AF XY:
0.454
AC XY:
61554
AN XY:
135712
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.626
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.660
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.305
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.746
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.458
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.490
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.359
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.417
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.392
AC:
573213
AN:
1461828
Hom.:
119452
Cov.:
67
AF XY:
0.391
AC XY:
284364
AN XY:
727214
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.623
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.643
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.309
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.726
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.455
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.485
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.356
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.401
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.475
AC:
72209
AN:
152014
Hom.:
18503
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.485
AC XY:
36007
AN XY:
74314
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.616
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.550
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.316
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.735
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.466
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.496
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.358
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.458
Alfa
AF:
0.378
Hom.:
8704
Bravo
AF:
0.490
TwinsUK
AF:
0.341
AC:
1264
ALSPAC
AF:
0.367
AC:
1413
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.608
AC:
2681
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.344
AC:
2957
ExAC
AF:
0.460
AC:
55843
Asia WGS
AF:
0.613
AC:
2132
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.350
EpiControl
AF:
0.355

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Benign:14Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 30, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterJan 15, 2016- -
not specified Benign:5Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 05, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 29, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Squamous cell lung carcinoma Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedclinical testing;in vivoFaculté Pluridciplinaire Nador, Université Mohamed PremierMay 05, 2020- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 27, 2016Variant summary: The c.4587C>G variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in amino acid change from Asp to Glu. 4/4 in-silico tools predict benign outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant is found in 55828/121360 control chromosomes (14197 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.4600198, which is about 1104047 times of the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0000004), suggesting this variant is benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as Benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 12, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.060
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.85
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
Cadd
Benign
0.041
Dann
Benign
0.59
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0070
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.8
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.8
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.00049
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.053
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000015
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.99
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;.
Vest4
0.015, 0.0060
MutPred
0.097
.;Loss of catalytic residue at D1529 (P = 0.0319);.;
MPC
0.16
ClinPred
0.0045
T
GERP RS
-3.4
Varity_R
0.026
gMVP
0.061

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1881421; hg19: chr2-29416366; COSMIC: COSV66569695; COSMIC: COSV66569695; API