rs189556433

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 2P and 8B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):c.7186G>T(p.Asp2396Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000383 in 1,551,982 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00076 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
NM_025114.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.607

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CEP290 links:

RLIG1 (HGNC:25322): (RNA 5'-phosphate and 3'-OH ligase 1) Predicted to act upstream of or within hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiation. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

RLIG1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0067878366).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000762 (116/152252) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0155 (80/5170). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0127. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 65 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4 link	c.7186G>T	p.Asp2396Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 53 of 54	ENST00000552810.6	NP_079390.3	O15078Q05BJ6
RLIG1	NM_001009894.3 link	c.*1955C>A		downstream_gene_variant		ENST00000356891.4	NP_001009894.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6 link	c.7186G>T	p.Asp2396Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 53 of 54	1	NM_025114.4	ENSP00000448012.1		O15078
C12orf29	ENST00000356891.4 link	c.*1955C>A		downstream_gene_variant		1	NM_001009894.3	ENSP00000349358.3		Q8N999-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000776

AC:

118

AN:

152132

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000555

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0156

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00118

AC:

276

AN:

234544

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00111

AC XY:

142

AN XY:

127386

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000340

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0140

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00103

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000184

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000535

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000342

AC:

479

AN:

1399730

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000364

AC XY:

254

AN XY:

698514

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000284

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00716

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000751

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00145

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000762

AC:

116

AN:

152252

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000873

AC XY:

AN XY:

74450

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000553

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0155

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00186

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000946

Alfa

AF:

0.000262

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000688

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000276

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00113

AC:

136

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0120

AC:

AN:

3474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Oct 15, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31630094) -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 4

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

not specified

Benign:1

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Leber congenital amaurosis

Benign:1

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis

Benign:1

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Retinal dystrophy

Benign:1

Oct 01, 2023

Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Joubert syndrome 5

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.34

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.24

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.17

.;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.0068

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.11

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.76

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.89

D;D;D

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0068

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.82

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.1

.;.;M

PrimateAI

Benign

0.39

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.2

N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.15

Sift

Uncertain

0.0060

D;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.010

D;D;D

Polyphen

0.91

.;.;P

Vest4

0.54

MVP

0.76

MPC

0.32

ClinPred

0.048

GERP RS

3.2

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.073

gMVP

0.42

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over