rs193922623
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP2BP6BS2
The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.2267G>A(p.Ser756Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00011 in 1,613,868 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RYR2
NM_001035.3 missense
NM_001035.3 missense
Scores
6
7
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.99
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PP2
?
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, RYR2
BP6
?
Variant 1-237500774-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237500774-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 36739.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=4}.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 22 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | NM_001035.3 | c.2267G>A | p.Ser756Asn | missense_variant | 21/105 | ENST00000366574.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | ENST00000366574.7 | c.2267G>A | p.Ser756Asn | missense_variant | 21/105 | 1 | NM_001035.3 | P1 | |
RYR2 | ENST00000660292.2 | c.2267G>A | p.Ser756Asn | missense_variant | 21/106 | ||||
RYR2 | ENST00000659194.3 | c.2267G>A | p.Ser756Asn | missense_variant | 21/105 | ||||
RYR2 | ENST00000609119.2 | c.2267G>A | p.Ser756Asn | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 21/104 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
152188
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000217 AC: 54AN: 249214Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000222 AC XY: 30AN XY: 135196
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
54
AN:
249214
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
135196
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000107 AC: 156AN: 1461680Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000110 AC XY: 80AN XY: 727114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
156
AN:
1461680
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
727114
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000202 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74344
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
152188
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74344
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
2
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
24
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:5Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 21, 2023 | Reported in association with HCM, DCM, and sudden unexplained death (Lopes et al., 2015; Subbotina et al., 2019; Burstein et al., 2021); Not located in one of the three hot-spot regions of the RYR2 gene, where the majority of pathogenic missense variants occur (Medeiros-Domingo et al., 2009); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30878466, 19926015, 28404607, 32746448, 25351510) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | provider interpretation | Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University | Nov 01, 2017 | p.Ser756Asn (c.2267G>A) in the RYR2 gene (NM_001035.2; chr1-237664074-G-A) SCICD Classification: variant of uncertain significance, likely benign based on limited data to associate this gene with disease and relatively high frequency in the general population. We do not feel it is suitable for assessing risk in healthy relatives ("predictive genetic testing"). Gene-level evidence: RYR2 has not been associated with HCM Region-level evidence: Per the lab report, this variant is not in one of the regions of RYR2 that is enriched for pathogenic variation. Population data: Highest MAF in Ashkenazi Jewish population: 0.4630%. The variant was reported online in 56 of 138571 individuals in the Genome Aggregation Consortium Dataset (gnomAD; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), which currently includes variant calls on >140,000 unrelated individuals of African, Asian, European, Ashkenazi, Latino descent. - |
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 19, 2017 | Variant summary: The RYR2 c.2267G>A (p.Ser756Asn) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 4/4 in silico tools predict damaging outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 24/120700 control chromosomes from ExAC at a frequency of 0.0001988, which is approximately 4 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RYR2 variant (0.000055), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, this variant has been detected at an allele frequency of ~0.5% (47/10152 chromosomes) in Ashkenazi subpopulation in gnomAD database, further supporting benign outcome. However, five clinical diagnostic laboratories (via ClinVar) have classified this variant as uncertain significance. LMM (via ClinVar) has reported this variant in two Caucasian adults with DCM and one Ashkenazi Jewish adult with HCM and has classified the variant as a VUS, although they do not report if this variant was found with other pathogenic variants in other genes, do not provide any familial co-segregation analysis and have not used ExAC data at that time. Due to the possibility of low penetrance pathogenic variants in the control population and unknown status of cardiological information in control populations, possibility of digenic inheritance in arrythmias and due to lack of functional and clinical data for this variant, the variant has been classified as a VUS-possibly benign until additional evidence becomes available. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 09, 2018 | proposed classification - variant undergoing re-assessment, contact laboratory - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Nov 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1 Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Blueprint Genetics | Mar 20, 2014 | - - |
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 22, 2018 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 25, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Pathogenic
Dann
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
D;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
Position offset: 12
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at