rs193922777
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM2PM5PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_000540.3(RYR1):c.4775C>A(p.Pro1592Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000131 in 152,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1592L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000540.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.4775C>A | p.Pro1592Gln | missense_variant | 33/106 | ENST00000359596.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.4775C>A | p.Pro1592Gln | missense_variant | 33/106 | 5 | NM_000540.3 | A2 | |
RYR1 | ENST00000355481.8 | c.4775C>A | p.Pro1592Gln | missense_variant | 33/105 | 1 | P4 | ||
RYR1 | ENST00000599547.6 | c.4775C>A | p.Pro1592Gln | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 33/80 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1409258Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 696124
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74338
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 11, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at