rs193922829
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions.This sequence variant predicts a substitution of glutamic acid with lysine at codon 2764 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Glu2764Lys). The maximum allele frequency for this variant among the six major gnomAD populations is EAS: 0.000109, a frequency consistent with pathogenicity for MHS. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in any individuals with a personal or family history of an MH episode and a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT). No functional studies were identified for this variant. This variant does not reside in a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS. A REVEL score of 0.842 supports neither a pathogenic nor a benign status for this variant. This variant has been classified as a Variant of Unknown Significance. No criteria implemented. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA024903/MONDO:0018493/012
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000540.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
- RYR1-related myopathyInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, PanelApp Australia
- congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- central core myopathyInheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- King-Denborough syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- malignant hyperthermia of anesthesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathyInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- benign Samaritan congenital myopathyInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- congenital myopathy with myasthenic-like onsetInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- lethal multiple pterygium syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000540.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYR1 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.8290G>A | p.Glu2764Lys | missense | Exon 52 of 106 | ENSP00000352608.2 | P21817-1 | ||
| RYR1 | TSL:1 | c.8290G>A | p.Glu2764Lys | missense | Exon 52 of 105 | ENSP00000347667.3 | P21817-2 | ||
| RYR1 | TSL:1 | n.8290G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 52 of 103 | ENSP00000470927.2 | M0R014 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251480 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000958 AC: 14AN: 1461880Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at