rs199689484
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_024009.3(GJB3):c.340G>A(p.Ala114Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A114V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024009.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024009.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJB3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.340G>A | p.Ala114Thr | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000362464.2 | O75712 | ||
| GJB3 | TSL:1 | c.340G>A | p.Ala114Thr | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000362460.3 | O75712 | ||
| SMIM12 | TSL:1 | n.208-66693C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000429902.1 | E5RH51 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000263 AC: 66AN: 250644 AF XY: 0.000347 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000161 AC: 235AN: 1461768Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000199 AC XY: 145AN XY: 727186 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152278Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000201 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74458 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at