rs199902986
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PVS1_ModerateBP6BS2
The ENST00000340096.11(OFD1):c.936-2A>G variant causes a splice acceptor change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000556 in 1,204,385 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 27 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000340096.11 splice_acceptor
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OFD1 | NM_003611.3 | c.936-2A>G | splice_acceptor_variant | ENST00000340096.11 | NP_003602.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OFD1 | ENST00000340096.11 | c.936-2A>G | splice_acceptor_variant | 1 | NM_003611.3 | ENSP00000344314 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000894 AC: 10AN: 111864Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0000881 AC XY: 3AN XY: 34036
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000116 AC: 21AN: 181017Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000106 AC XY: 7AN XY: 66197
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000522 AC: 57AN: 1092521Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0000669 AC XY: 24AN XY: 358679
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000894 AC: 10AN: 111864Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0000881 AC XY: 3AN XY: 34036
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 18, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2023 | OFD1: BS2 - |
Congenital anomaly of kidney and urinary tract Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | May 29, 2020 | The heterozygous c.936-2A>G variant in OFD1 was identified by our study in an individual with nephronophthisis (PMID: 30143558). This variant has also been reported as a VUS by EGL Genetic Diagnostics and benign by Invitae (for orofaciodigital syndrome I/Joubert syndrome) in ClinVar (Variation ID: 193661). This variant has been identified in 0.276% (21/7602) of Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes, including 7 hemizygotes, by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs199902986). Although this variant has been seen in the general population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. This variant occurs in the invariant region (+/- 1/2) of the splice consensus sequence and is predicted to cause altered splicing leading to an abnormal or absent protein. While there is some evidence to suggest that loss of function of the OFD1 gene is a disease mechanism in x-linked nephronophthisis, this association is not yet strongly established based on the criteria laid out in Tayoun, 2018 (PMID: 30192042). In summary, the clinical significance of the c.936-2A>G variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PVS1_supporting (Richards 2015). - |
OFD1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 13, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Familial aplasia of the vermis;C1510460:Orofaciodigital syndrome I Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 25, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at