Menu
GeneBe

rs200050883

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):​c.1312G>T​(p.Asp438Tyr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000376 in 1,613,498 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D438G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense

Scores

1
10
7

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:22B:10O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.62
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.045587093).
BP6
Variant 22-28695190-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-28695190-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 128056.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=14, Likely_benign=9, not_provided=2}.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1312G>T p.Asp438Tyr missense_variant 12/15 ENST00000404276.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1312G>T p.Asp438Tyr missense_variant 12/151 NM_007194.4 P2O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000375
AC:
57
AN:
152144
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000966
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00549
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000754
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000514
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000386
AC:
97
AN:
251038
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000339
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
135660
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00134
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000490
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000376
AC:
549
AN:
1461236
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000359
AC XY:
261
AN XY:
726952
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000394
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000362
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000265
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000374
AC:
57
AN:
152262
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000403
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000963
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000754
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000514
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000426
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000280
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000280
AC:
34
EpiCase
AF:
0.00109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:22Benign:10Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:9Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 26, 2023Published functional studies are inconclusive/conflicting: demonstrates intermediate/reduced kinase activity in some studies while others, including a human-cell based assay, show activity comparable to wildtype (Bell et al., 2007; Delimitsou et al., 2019; Kleiblova et al., 2019; Boonen et al., 2022); Observed in individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer (Seppala et al., 2003; Bell et al., 2007; Tischkowitz et al., 2008; Baloch et al., 2014; Tung et al., 2015; Kayser et al., 2018; Fanale et al., 2020; Grasel et al., 2020; Moradian et al., 2021; Paduano et al., 2022); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 14612911, 15087378, 28828701, 28776603, 28873162, 24390236, 17721994, 18571837, 23960188, 21244692, 27067391, 26787654, 28553140, 25186627, 27153395, 27498913, 27878467, 28452373, 19768534, 29335925, 27595995, 27443514, 29987844, 29484706, 30344923, 28301460, 30851065, 29875428, 29522266, 31050813, 31398194, 31159747, 28779002, 31220302, 33134171, 33322746, 32854451, 33558524, 27009842, 32906215, 30613976, 27535533, 34903604, 34347074, 22419737, 19782031, 35886069, 33840814) -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024CHEK2: BP1, BP4, BS2 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityJun 14, 2023- -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-The variant was identified in multiple GenomeConnect participants. Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 03-29-2018 by Lab or GTR ID Northwell Health Laboratories. Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported, most recently, on 12/04/2018 by GTR ID Credit Valley Hospital Department of Laboratory Medicine. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 01, 2023In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMIDs: 36653541 (2023), 35886069 (2022), 33558524 (2021), 33134171 (2020), 31050813 (2019), 29484706 (2018), 29335925 (2018), 28779002 (2017), 25186627 (2015), 24390236 (2014), 21244692 (2011)), endometrial cancer (PMID:27443514 (2016)), colorectal cancer (PMID: 29987844 (2018)), and prostate cancer (PMIDs: 18571837 (2008), 17721994 (2007), 14612911 (2003)). This variant has also been identified in healthy control individuals (PMIDs: 36653541 (2023), 31050813 (2019), 30303537 (2019), 28779002 (2017), 21244692 (2011), 17721994 (2007)), and reported to co-occur with deleterious variants in the MRE11 and MSH2 genes (PMIDs: 33134171 (2020), 27443514 (2016)). Case-control studies suggest this variant is associated with prostate cancer risk but not breast cancer risk (PMIDs: 27595995 (2016), 36653541 (2023)). In addition, experimental studies indicate this variant has neutral to intermediate effects on CHEK2 protein function (PMIDs: 34903604 (2022), 31050813 (2019), 30851065 (2019), 17721994 (2007)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0013 (32/25122 chromosomes in European (Finnish) subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylAug 12, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchCenter of Medical Genetics and Primary Health CareApr 08, 2020ACMG Guidelines 2015 criteria PM1 Pathogenic Moderate: Pkinase domain (M265-529L aa) which contains the catalytic function of protein kinases. Hot-spot has 21 non-VUS coding variants (7 pathogenic and 14 benign), pathogenicity = 33.3%, proximity score 3.967 > threshold 2.472. PP1 Pathogenic Supporting: Cosegregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease. PP2 Pathogenic Supporting: 30 out of 48 non-VUS missense variants in gene CHEK2 are pathogenic = 62.5% > threshold of 51.0%, and 308 out of 1,604 clinically reported variants in gene CHEK2 are pathogenic = 19.2% > threshold of 12.0%. PP1 Pathogenic Supporting: 2 patients are sibs (sisters) who share the same variant. BP4 Benign Supporting: 6 benign predictions from DEOGEN2, EIGEN, MVP, MutationAssessor, PrimateAI and REVEL vs 5 pathogenic predictions from DANN, FATHMM-MKL, M-CAP, MutationTaster and SIFT and the position is not conserved." Therefore, this variant was classified as a Variant of Unknown Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 09, 2023This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchResearch Unit of Translational Medicine, University of OuluNov 22, 2022The frequency of p.Asp438Tyr variant in CHEK2 among Northern Finnish breast cancer cases was 0.6% (14/2284) and nearly equal in geographically matched healthy population controls (0.8%, 10/1299) in a study by Kumpula et al. (2023). Similar carrier frequencies in the studied cases and the general population argue against association of CHEK2 p.Asp438Tyr with increased breast cancer risk. Therefore the variant can be classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneKor MSAAug 01, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthAug 30, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, University Clinics Duesseldorf-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 14, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 28, 2023Variant summary: CHEK2 c.1312G>T (p.Asp438Tyr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Protein kinase domain (IPR000719) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0004 in 261860 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00046 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.5- fold the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (0.00031), suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. However, the frequency in gnomAD and the cases reported in the literature may not be accurate due to the sequencing technology used being unable to distinguish between CHEK2 and its multiple overlapping pseudogenes. This variant has also been reported among 7 women older than 70 years who have never had cancer as reported in the FLOSSIES database. c.1312G>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer, but also in controls and in a family where it did not segregate with disease (examples- Baloch_2013, Bell_2007, LeCalvez-Kelm_2011, Seppala_2003, Tischkowitz_2008, Young_2016, Yadav_2016, Tung_2015, Maxwell_2016, Fostira_2018, Scarpetta_2019). Case control approaches indicated no significant risk association for breast cancer, but a slightly elevated risk for prostate cancer (Le Calvez-Kelm_2011, Southey_2016). These data thus do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported (MSH2 c.1697del, p.Asn566IlefsX24), providing supporting evidence for a benign role (Ring_2016). In a mammalian cell based kinase-assay the variant protein showed about 70% reduction in activity (Bell_2007), whereas in a yeast based DNA-damage assay the variant showed similar function to the wild type supporting a benign outcome (Delimitsou_2019). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 24390236, 17721994, 15087378, 30851065, 31811167, 29335925, 30303537, 33134171, 29484706, 25231023, 29987844, 21244692, 30322893, 27153395, 33558524, 27443514, 31512090, 14612911, 27595995, 18571837, 31159747, 25186627, 29875428, 27878467, 31214250, 26787654, 28828701, 23960188). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and cited the variant as uncertain significance (n=15) and likely benign (n=5). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJan 11, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalJul 31, 2024- -
CHEK2-related cancer predisposition Uncertain:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network-Variant interpreted as Likely benign and reported on 04-04-2017 by Lab Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -
CHEK2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 30, 2024The CHEK2 c.1312G>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asp438Tyr. This variant has been reported in individuals with a history of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers; but has also been reported in unaffected control individuals (Baloch et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 24390236; Supplementary Table 1, Le Calvez-Kelm et al. 2011. PubMed ID: 21244692; Tischkowitz et al. 2008. PubMed ID: 18571837; Kleiblova et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 31050813; Moradian et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 33558524; Biscaglia et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 34347074). Functional studies have shown this variant impacts CHEK2 kinase activity by 70% when compared to wild-type protein; however, it is unclear whether this is sufficient to contribute to disease (Bell et al. 2007. PubMed ID: 17721994). This variant is reported in 0.13% of alleles in individuals of European (Finnish) descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/22-29091178-C-A). It has conflicting interpretations in ClinVar ranging from likely benign to uncertain significance (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/128056/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioFeb 27, 2023- -
Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0585442:Bone osteosarcoma;C5882668:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2017- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationGerman Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital CologneJan 09, 2024Results from functional assays as well as predictions are contradictory. According to the ACMG standard criteria we chose this criterium: BS1 (strong benign): gnomAD v3.1.2 (non-cancer): AF: 0.0005092 + 1 x hom -
Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsOct 12, 2019This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
Carcinoma of colon Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The CHEK2 p.Asp438Tyr variant was identified in 4 of 1332 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from Pakistani, Finnish, Polish and Ashkenazi Jewish individuals or families with breast, early onset breast and prostate, or hereditary prostate cancer and was not identified in 590 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Baloch 2014, Seppala 2003, Tischkowitz 2008, Bell 2007). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs200050883) “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Counsyl, and Color Genomics), and the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (14x, co-occurring with CHEK2 c.1100delC). The variant was not identified in Cosmic. The variant was identified in control databases in 108 of 276806 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0004 (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations: European in 57 of 126326 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0005), Finnish in 33 of 25792 chromosomes (frequency: 0.001), African in 3 of 24032 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0001), Other in 4 of 6456 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0006), Latino in 2 of 34404 chromosomes (frequency: 0.00006), and South Asian in 9 of 30776 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0003). The variant occurs in the catalytic domain of the CHEK2 protein and in vitro analysis of kinase activity showed the variant had a 70% decrease in activity compared to wildtype (Baloch 2014, Bell 2007). The p.Asp438 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the Tyr variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJan 23, 2024- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingCenter of Medical Genetics and Primary Health Care-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.26
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.084
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.010
CADD
Pathogenic
29
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.27
T;.;T;.;T;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.40
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.50
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.97
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.13
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.046
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.83
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
L;.;L;.;L;.;L;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.60
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.9
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.34
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;D;.;D;P;D;D;D
Vest4
0.74
MVP
0.83
MPC
0.15
ClinPred
0.16
T
GERP RS
5.8
Varity_R
0.82
gMVP
0.74

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200050883; hg19: chr22-29091178; COSMIC: COSV105248010; COSMIC: COSV105248010; API