rs200338014
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_004628.5(XPC):c.1000C>T(p.Pro334Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000459 in 1,613,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P334H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004628.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004628.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPC | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1000C>T | p.Pro334Ser | missense | Exon 9 of 16 | ENSP00000285021.8 | Q01831-1 | ||
| XPC | TSL:1 | n.*453C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 8 of 15 | ENSP00000424548.1 | Q01831-3 | |||
| XPC | TSL:1 | n.*453C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 8 of 15 | ENSP00000424548.1 | Q01831-3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000263 AC: 40AN: 152078Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00103 AC: 254AN: 247046 AF XY: 0.00127 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000480 AC: 701AN: 1461680Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000686 AC XY: 499AN XY: 727126 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000263 AC: 40AN: 152196Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000349 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74396 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at