Menu
GeneBe

rs200359745

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.716T>A(p.Leu239Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000577 in 1,577,786 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L239L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000058 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:15B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.116
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06748453).
BP6
Variant 2-214781158-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214781158-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127746.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=15, Likely_benign=2}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 9 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BARD1NM_000465.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.716T>A p.Leu239Gln missense_variant 4/11 ENST00000260947.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BARD1ENST00000260947.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.716T>A p.Leu239Gln missense_variant 4/111 NM_000465.4 P2Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000591
AC:
9
AN:
152202
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000101
AC:
22
AN:
217412
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000102
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
117248
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000645
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000375
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000434
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000198
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000575
AC:
82
AN:
1425466
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000679
AC XY:
48
AN XY:
706924
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000636
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000552
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000128
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000573
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000102
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000591
AC:
9
AN:
152320
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000537
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000641
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000416
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000107
AC:
13

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:15Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:5Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 28, 2024This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 239 of the BARD1 protein (p.Leu239Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs200359745, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 26976419, 31159747, 35595798). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127746). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The glutamine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BARD1 function (PMID: 30925164). Studies have shown that this missense change is associated with altered splicing resulting in multiple RNA products (Invitae). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJul 02, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Feb 24, 2023This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSt. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalAug 23, 2022The BARD1 c.716T>A (p.Leu239Gln) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.016% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). This variant has been reported in the literature in individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 26976419, 31159747, 32039725, 33471991). It has also been reported in one individual in a database of women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (FLOSSIES database, https://whi.color.com/). Algorithms that predict the impact of sequence changes on splicing indicate that this change may affect splicing. RNA studies indicate that this variant strengthens a cryptic splice within exon 4 of the BARD1 gene and causes leaky splicing (PMID: 31275557). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function and functional analysis indicates that this variant has homology-directed repair (HDR) comparable to the wild-type (PMID: 30925164). In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 16, 2017- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 17, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 19, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneKor MSAAug 01, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 28, 2022The p.L239Q variant (also known as c.716T>A), located in coding exon 4 of the BARD1 gene, results from a T to A substitution at nucleotide position 716. The leucine at codon 239 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. This alteration has been reported in individuals with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (da Costa E Silva Carvalho S et al. BMC Med Genomics, 2020 02;13:21; Tsaousis GN et al. BMC Cancer, 2019 Jun;19:535; Tung N et al. J. Clin. Oncol., 2016 May;34:1460-8; Young EL et al. J. Med. Genet., 2016 06;53:366-76). This alteration was found to be functional in a homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) assay (Adamovich AI et al. PLoS Genet., 2019 03;15:e1008049). RNA analyses have shown that this alteration leads to aberrant splicing by creating a new alternate donor site (Shirley BC et al. F1000Res, 2018 Dec;7:1908).This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.May 23, 2018- -
not specified Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 10, 2019Variant summary: BARD1 c.716T>A (p.Leu239Gln) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0001 in 217412 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00017 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is somewhat lower than the expected maximum for a pathogenic variant in BARD1 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (0.00017 vs 0.00025), allowing no clear conclusions about variant significance. c.716T>A has been reported in the literature in individuals with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (e.g. Tung_2016, Tsaousis_2019, Adamovich_2019) and other tumor phenotypes (Adamovich_2019); however without strong evidence for causality. These reports therefore do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. One publication reported experimental evidence demonstrating that the variant protein is fully functional in homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) (Adamovich_2019). Ten other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation: nine laboratories cited the variant as uncertain significance, while one cited the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoOct 25, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 15, 2023In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 26976419 (2016), 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/BARD1), 35264596 (2022)), as well as unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/BARD1)). A functional study reported that this variant has proficient homology-directed repair (HDR) activity (PMID: 30925164 (2019)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00016 (19/118622 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Additional analysis using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on BARD1 mRNA splicing yielded predictions that this variant may result in the gain of a cryptic splice site without affecting the natural splice sites. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 11, 2023In silico analysis supports a deleterious effect on splicing; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Published functional studies are inconclusive: homology-directed repair activity comparable to wild type, but may cause abnormal splicing (Shirley et al., 2018; Adamovich et al., 2019); Observed in individuals with personal or family history of breast or other cancers and also in unaffected controls (Tung et al., 2016; Tsaousis et al., 2019; da Costa e Silva Carvalho et al., 2020; Dorling et al., 2021; Guindalini et al., 2022); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32039725, 26976419, 26787654, 27720647, 30925164, 31159747, 31275557, 35595798, 33471991, 35264596) -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioSep 13, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.061
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
Cadd
Benign
15
Dann
Benign
0.26
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.080
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.053
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.55
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.014
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.067
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.020
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.071
Sift
Benign
0.61
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.51
T;T
Polyphen
0.014
B;.
Vest4
0.14
MVP
0.56
MPC
0.079
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
-4.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.066
gMVP
0.32

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.57
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
0.57
Position offset: -1

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200359745; hg19: chr2-215645882; API