rs200435277

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):c.3435C>T(p.Phe1145Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000243 in 1,614,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00023 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00024 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.36

Variant links:

Genes affected

PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

PTCH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).

BP6

Variant 9-95453492-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95453492-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 135891.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.36 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00023 (35/152240) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00395 (19/4814). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00258. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 24 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 35 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PTCH1	NM_000264.5 link	c.3435C>T	p.Phe1145Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 24	ENST00000331920.11	NP_000255.2	Q13635-1
PTCH1	NM_001083603.3 link	c.3432C>T	p.Phe1144Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 24	ENST00000437951.6	NP_001077072.1	Q13635-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PTCH1	ENST00000331920.11 link	c.3435C>T	p.Phe1145Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 24	5	NM_000264.5	ENSP00000332353.6		Q13635-1
PTCH1	ENST00000437951.6 link	c.3432C>T	p.Phe1144Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 24	5	NM_001083603.3	ENSP00000389744.2		Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000224

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00317

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00374

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000470

AC:

118

AN:

251288

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000663

AC XY:

AN XY:

135840

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00271

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000106

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000244

AC:

357

AN:

1461786

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000334

AC XY:

243

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000894

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00274

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000369

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000364

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

152240

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000322

AC XY:

AN XY:

74444

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00317

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00395

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000213

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000128

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Gorlin syndrome

Benign:3

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Aug 24, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

PTCH1: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Jun 12, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aug 25, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

not specified

Benign:1

May 20, 2022

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PTCH1-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 19, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Holoprosencephaly 7

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.37

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.72

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over