rs200698755

Variant names:

• chr7-44145125-G-A
• rs200698755
• NM_000162.5:c.*11C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_Strong BP6 BS1

The NM_000162.5(GCK):​c.*11C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00013 in 1,609,784 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00045 (0 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000097 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: GCK NM_000162.5 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3 B:5
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.236

Genes affected

GCK (HGNC:4195): (glucokinase) This gene encodes a member of the hexokinase family of proteins. Hexokinases phosphorylate glucose to produce glucose-6-phosphate, the first step in most glucose metabolism pathways. In contrast to other forms of hexokinase, this enzyme is not inhibited by its product glucose-6-phosphate but remains active while glucose is abundant. The use of multiple promoters and alternative splicing of this gene result in distinct protein isoforms that exhibit tissue-specific expression in the pancreas and liver. In the pancreas, this enzyme plays a role in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, while in the liver, this enzyme is important in glucose uptake and conversion to glycogen. Mutations in this gene that alter enzyme activity have been associated with multiple types of diabetes and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
• BP6: Variant 7-44145125-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-44145125-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 255399.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=3}.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000453 (69/152342) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00147 (61/41592). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00117. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 27 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GCK	NM_000162.5	c.*11C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 10 of 10	ENST00000403799.8	NP_000153.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GCK	ENST00000403799	c.*11C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 10 of 10	1	NM_000162.5	ENSP00000384247.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000440 AC: 67 AN: 152224 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00142

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000327

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000955

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000174 AC: 42 AN: 241972 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000144 AC XY: 19 AN XY: 131966

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00218

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000146

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000331

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000183

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000967 AC: 141 AN: 1457442 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000979 AC XY: 71 AN XY: 724998

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00224

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000202

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000233

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000279

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000365

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000453 AC: 69 AN: 152342 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000362 AC XY: 27 AN XY: 74494

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00147

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000327

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000945

Alfa AF: 0.000427 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000582

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3 Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3

Sep 30, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: GCK c.*11C>T is located in the untranslated mRNA region downstream of the termination codon. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00018 in 273340 control chromosomes (gnomAD), predominantly at a frequency of 0.0016 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 64 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in GCK causing Monogenic Diabetes (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.*11C>T has been reported in the literature as a polymorphism routinely seen during sequencing of the GCK gene (Osbak_2009). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: one submitter classified the variant as VUS for Hyperinsulinism and likely benign for Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young, and one submitter classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Transient Neonatal Diabetes, Recessive Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Hyperinsulinism due to glucokinase deficiency Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 2 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young Benign:1

-

Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

Potent mutations in GCK gene is associated with poor secretion of insulin. Its associated with milder forms of diabetes, which can be controlled by diet . However, there is no sufficient evidence to ascertain the significance of rs200698755 in MODY, yet. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.78
CADD	Benign	3.2
DANN	Benign	0.80

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200698755; hg19: chr7-44184724;