rs200737571
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PP3_ModerateBS2
The NM_005477.3(HCN4):c.1896G>A(p.Met632Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000229 in 1,614,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M632R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005477.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- sick sinus syndrome 2, autosomal dominantInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- Brugada syndrome 8Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- familial sick sinus syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissectionInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- Brugada syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000318 AC: 8AN: 251480 AF XY: 0.0000368 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000239 AC: 35AN: 1461886Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000275 AC XY: 20AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74366 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
- -
Observed in one individual from a cohort of individuals not selected for cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, or family history of sudden cardiac death, who underwent exome sequencing (Ng et al., 2013), although a follow-up cardiac evaluation was not reported; Identified independently and in conjunction with additional variants in individuals referred for cardiac genetic testing at GeneDx; segregation data are limited or absent at this time; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23861362) -
Brugada syndrome 8 Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 632 of the HCN4 protein (p.Met632Ile). This variant is present in population databases (rs200737571, gnomAD 0.07%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with HCN4-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 191453). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt HCN4 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The p.M632I variant (also known as c.1896G>A), located in coding exon 6 of the HCN4 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1896. The methionine at codon 632 is replaced by isoleucine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at