rs200844292

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_000321.3(RB1):c.929G>A(p.Gly310Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000376 in 1,570,788 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00039 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RB1
NM_000321.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.53

Variant links:

Genes affected

RB1 (HGNC:9884): (RB transcriptional corepressor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a negative regulator of the cell cycle and was the first tumor suppressor gene found. The encoded protein also stabilizes constitutive heterochromatin to maintain the overall chromatin structure. The active, hypophosphorylated form of the protein binds transcription factor E2F1. Defects in this gene are a cause of childhood cancer retinoblastoma (RB), bladder cancer, and osteogenic sarcoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RB1 links:

LOC112268118 (HGNC:):

LOC112268118 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07991445).

BP6

Variant 13-48364961-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-48364961-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 237678.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr13-48364961-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 42 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RB1	NM_000321.3 link	c.929G>A	p.Gly310Glu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 27	ENST00000267163.6	NP_000312.2	P06400A0A024RDV3
RB1	NM_001407165.1 link	c.929G>A	p.Gly310Glu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 27		NP_001394094.1
RB1	NM_001407166.1 link	c.929G>A	p.Gly310Glu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 17		NP_001394095.1
LOC112268118	XR_002957522.2 link	n.137C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 3 of 3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RB1	ENST00000267163.6 link	c.929G>A	p.Gly310Glu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 27	1	NM_000321.3	ENSP00000267163.4		P06400
RB1	ENST00000650461.1 link	c.929G>A	p.Gly310Glu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 27			ENSP00000497193.1		A0A3B3IS71

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000283

AC:

AN:

151918

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000484

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000947

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000280

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000366

AC:

AN:

196856

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000388

AC XY:

AN XY:

105796

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000903

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000987

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000104

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000402

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00118

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000387

AC:

549

AN:

1418752

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000383

AC XY:

269

AN XY:

702480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000939

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000999

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000178

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000434

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000360

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000276

AC:

AN:

152036

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000283

AC XY:

AN XY:

74328

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000947

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000280

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000501

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000363

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000236

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000255

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3470

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinoblastoma

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Aug 22, 2020

Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jul 02, 2018

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 20, 2024

Genetic Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Case and Pedigree Information: BILATERAL CASES:0, UNILATERAL CASES:1, TOTAL CASES:1, PEDIGREES:1. ACMG Codes Applied:BS1, BS2, BP4 -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Mar 06, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25525159, 15884040, 22180099) -

Nov 28, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

RB1: BS1, BS2 -

not specified

Benign:3

Nov 25, 2022

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: RB1 c.929G>A (p.Gly310Glu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00037 in 196856 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 8.8 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RB1 causing Retinoblastoma phenotype (4.2e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Although reported in the literature, to our knowledge, no penetrant association of c.929G>A in individuals affected with Retinoblastoma and no conclusive experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with a majority consensus as benign/likely benign (n=8) (VUS, n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Aug 10, 2020

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Gly310Glu variant in RB1 is classified as likely benign because it has been identified in 0.13% (8/6190) of "Other" and 0.099% (32/32270) of Latino chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Nov 01, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 16, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.21

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.030

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.11

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.75

D;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.50

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.49

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.77

LIST_S2

Benign

0.81

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.059

MetaRNN

Benign

0.080

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.55

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

M;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.60

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.9

D;.

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.74

Sift

Benign

0.19

T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.094

T;.

Polyphen

1.0

D;.

Vest4

0.82

MVP

0.89

MPC

0.61

ClinPred

0.062

GERP RS

4.7

Varity_R

0.39

gMVP

0.67

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over