rs201032007

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):​c.1028C>T​(p.Thr343Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000124 in 1,614,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00017 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.614
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.052904367).
BP6
Variant 2-214780846-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214780846-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127712.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=8}. Variant chr2-214780846-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 26 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BARD1NM_000465.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1028C>T p.Thr343Ile missense_variant 4/11 ENST00000260947.9 NP_000456.2 Q99728-1A0AVN2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BARD1ENST00000260947.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1028C>T p.Thr343Ile missense_variant 4/111 NM_000465.4 ENSP00000260947.4 Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000177
AC:
27
AN:
152162
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000851
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000127
AC:
32
AN:
251212
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000118
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
135790
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000347
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000119
AC:
174
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000107
AC XY:
78
AN XY:
727202
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000358
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000153
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000125
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000215
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000171
AC:
26
AN:
152280
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000228
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000135
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000200
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.0000906
AC:
11
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJul 02, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJul 26, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 343 of the BARD1 protein (p.Thr343Ile). This variant is present in population databases (rs201032007, gnomAD 0.04%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 26315354, 27443514, 34646395, 35595798). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127712). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BARD1 function (PMID: 30925164). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinJul 22, 2022ACMG classification criteria: PM2 moderated, BP4 supporting -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Feb 24, 2023This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 17, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 30, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 08, 2021- -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 11, 2024Variant summary: BARD1 c.1028C>T (p.Thr343Ile) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00012 in 1614100 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BARD1 causing Breast Cancer (0.00012 vs 0.00025), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1028C>T has been reported in the literature as a VUS in settings of multigene panel testing among individuals with a variety of cancers (example, Ramus_2015, Ring_2016, Bonache_2018, Laraqui_2021, Benito-Sanchez_2022). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast and/or BARD1 associated Cancer. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant on Homology Directed Repair and damage sensitivity (Adamovich_2019). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 30925164, 35595798, 30306255, 34646395, 26315354, 27443514). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127712). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 14, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 09, 2024Observed in individuals with endometrial, ovarian, breast, or other cancers (PMID: 26315354, 27443514, 28717660, 34646395, 35595798); Published functional studies are inconclusive: decreased homology-directed repair activity, but not significantly different from the wild-type control (PMID: 30925164); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27443514, 26315354, 28717660, 34646395, 35595798, 32980694, 33471991, 25085752, 36243179, 30925164, 30306255) -
BARD1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 12, 2024The BARD1 c.1028C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Thr343Ile. This variant has been reported in individuals with ovarian and endometrial cancer (Ramus et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 26315354; Table S2, Ring et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 27443514) as well as in an individual with colorectal adenocarcinoma that harbored a pathogenic variant in the FANCL gene (Table 7, Cabanillas et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28717660). It is reported as a germline variant in a breast tumor and an ovarian tumor sample from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (Adamovich et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 30925164). However, it has also been reported in an unaffected individual (Table S4, Ramus et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 26315354). It has been reported in up to 0.04% of individuals from a large population database and has conflicting interpretations of likely benign and uncertain significance in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/127712/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.33
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.14
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.56
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.58
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.045
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.67
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.020
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.053
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.76
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
M;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.3
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.083
Sift
Benign
0.063
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T;T
Polyphen
0.031
B;.
Vest4
0.075
MVP
0.84
MPC
0.084
ClinPred
0.046
T
GERP RS
3.8
Varity_R
0.058
gMVP
0.16

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201032007; hg19: chr2-215645570; API