rs201274041
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1
The NM_000245.4(MET):c.1076G>A(p.Arg359Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000317 in 1,594,300 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R359L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000245.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET | NM_000245.4 | c.1076G>A | p.Arg359Gln | missense_variant | 2/21 | ENST00000397752.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET | ENST00000397752.8 | c.1076G>A | p.Arg359Gln | missense_variant | 2/21 | 1 | NM_000245.4 | P3 | |
MET | ENST00000318493.11 | c.1076G>A | p.Arg359Gln | missense_variant | 2/21 | 1 | A2 | ||
MET | ENST00000436117.3 | c.1076G>A | p.Arg359Gln | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2/20 | 1 | |||
MET | ENST00000422097.2 | c.1076G>A | p.Arg359Gln | missense_variant | 2/12 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000237 AC: 36AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000228 AC: 53AN: 232152Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000295 AC XY: 37AN XY: 125308
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000325 AC: 469AN: 1442008Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000309 AC XY: 221AN XY: 715342
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000236 AC: 36AN: 152292Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74456
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 27, 2024 | In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Published functional studies suggest this variant may increase MET expression but does not appear to impact cell migration or invasion (PMID: 34389035); Observed in individuals with thyroid cancer and breast cancer (PMID: 30086788, 34389035, 35264596); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26718692, 28192086, 29049316, Rastegar2021[abstract], 34389035, 23334666, 26700204, 28873162, 28619094, 30086788, 35264596) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 01, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
Renal cell carcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 359 of the MET protein (p.Arg359Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs201274041, gnomAD 0.04%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MET-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 93564). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt MET protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Sep 11, 2024 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following: it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease, and/or has normal protein function, and/or has lack of segregation with disease, and/or has been detected in co-occurrence with known pathogenic variant, and/or has lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or is located in a region inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 06, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at