Menu
GeneBe

rs201274041

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1

The NM_000245.4(MET):c.1076G>A(p.Arg359Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000317 in 1,594,300 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R359L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00033 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MET
NM_000245.4 missense

Scores

5
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.29
Variant links:
Genes affected
MET (HGNC:7029): (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins and the product of the proto-oncogene MET. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that are linked via disulfide bonds to form the mature receptor. Further processing of the beta subunit results in the formation of the M10 peptide, which has been shown to reduce lung fibrosis. Binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, induces dimerization and activation of the receptor, which plays a role in cellular survival, embryogenesis, and cellular migration and invasion. Mutations in this gene are associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and various head and neck cancers. Amplification and overexpression of this gene are also associated with multiple human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.12936655).
BP6
Variant 7-116700160-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-116700160-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 93564.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=6, Likely_benign=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000236 (36/152292) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000397 (27/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00028. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 10 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
METNM_000245.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1076G>A p.Arg359Gln missense_variant 2/21 ENST00000397752.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
METENST00000397752.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1076G>A p.Arg359Gln missense_variant 2/211 NM_000245.4 P3P08581-1
METENST00000318493.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1076G>A p.Arg359Gln missense_variant 2/211 A2P08581-2
METENST00000436117.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1076G>A p.Arg359Gln missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 2/201 P08581-3
METENST00000422097.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1076G>A p.Arg359Gln missense_variant 2/123

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000228
AC:
53
AN:
232152
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000295
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
125308
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000392
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000409
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000325
AC:
469
AN:
1442008
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000309
AC XY:
221
AN XY:
715342
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000920
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000167
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000122
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000408
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000134
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000236
AC:
36
AN:
152292
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000134
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000349
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000280
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000256
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000361
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000248
AC:
30

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 01, 2013- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 07, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with thyroid cancer and breast cancer (Penkert et al., 2018; Johansson et al., 2021; Guindalini et al., 2022); Published functional studies suggest this variant may increase MET expression but does not appear to impact cell migration and invasion (Johansson et al., 2021); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26718692, 28192086, 29049316, Rastegar2021[abstract], 34389035, 23334666, 26700204, 28873162, 28619094, 30086788, 35264596) -
Papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJul 02, 2018- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalFeb 06, 2024- -
Renal cell carcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 359 of the MET protein (p.Arg359Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs201274041, gnomAD 0.04%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MET-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 93564). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt MET protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 06, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.084
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.41
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.23
T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.60
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.62
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.87
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.94
D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.0070
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.13
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.2
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.6
L;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.97
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.51
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Benign
0.051
T;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.41
T;T;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;.
Vest4
0.27
MVP
0.46
MPC
0.85
ClinPred
0.070
T
GERP RS
6.0
Varity_R
0.29
gMVP
0.45

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201274041; hg19: chr7-116340214; COSMIC: COSV59264672; COSMIC: COSV59264672; API