rs201418615
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.25481G>A(p.Arg8494Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000113 in 1,613,692 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.25481G>A | p.Arg8494Gln | missense_variant | Exon 88 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.25481G>A | p.Arg8494Gln | missense_variant | Exon 88 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000539 AC: 82AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000141 AC: 35AN: 248936 AF XY: 0.000118 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000691 AC: 101AN: 1461418Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000509 AC XY: 37AN XY: 726988 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000539 AC: 82AN: 152274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000591 AC XY: 44AN XY: 74444 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
- -
- -
- -
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27604489, 23861362) -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Variant summary: TTN c.21749G>A (p.Arg7250Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the I-band domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0002 in 280342 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0022 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TTN causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.00039), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.21749G>A in individuals affected with Dilated Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. One co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been internally reported (TTR c.424G>A, p.V142I), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Three ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (1x) and likely benign (2x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
The p.Arg7250Gln variant in TTN has not been previously reported in individuals with cardiomyopathy, but has been identified in 0.15% (15/9798) of African chrom osomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org ; dbSNP rs201418615). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis d o not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary , the clinical significance of the p.Arg7250Gln variant is uncertain. -
- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at