rs201500134

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 1P and 11B. PP2BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):​c.8162T>C​(p.Ile2721Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 1,519,710 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I2721L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00064 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0014 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 missense

Scores

1
12
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.82
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in the RYR2 gene, where missense mutations are typically associated with disease (based on misZ statistic). The gene has 195 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 55 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: 5.7809 (above the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 6.4158 (above the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.17361951).
BP6
Variant 1-237657976-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237657976-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43828.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=5}. Variant chr1-237657976-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000644 (98/152182) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00131 (89/67972). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00109. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 39 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 98 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RYR2NM_001035.3 linkc.8162T>C p.Ile2721Thr missense_variant Exon 54 of 105 ENST00000366574.7 NP_001026.2 Q92736-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RYR2ENST00000366574.7 linkc.8162T>C p.Ile2721Thr missense_variant Exon 54 of 105 1 NM_001035.3 ENSP00000355533.2 Q92736-1
RYR2ENST00000609119.2 linkn.8162T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 54 of 104 5 ENSP00000499659.2 A0A590UK06
RYR2ENST00000660292.2 linkc.8162T>C p.Ile2721Thr missense_variant Exon 54 of 106 ENSP00000499787.2 A0A590UKB7
RYR2ENST00000659194.3 linkc.8162T>C p.Ile2721Thr missense_variant Exon 54 of 105 ENSP00000499653.3 A0A590UJZ8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000644
AC:
98
AN:
152064
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000945
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000575
AC:
79
AN:
137332
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000577
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
72842
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000148
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000421
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000536
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00138
AC:
1881
AN:
1367528
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
26
AF XY:
0.00137
AC XY:
922
AN XY:
674114
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000133
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000325
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000405
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000572
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000670
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000644
AC:
98
AN:
152182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000524
AC XY:
39
AN XY:
74400
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000945
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000975
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000676
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00270
AC:
10
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000560
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000502
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
0.000244
AC:
25

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:3Benign:1
Sep 21, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The Ile2721Thr variant in RYR2 has not been reported in the literature nor previ ously identified by our laboratory. This variant has been identified in 4/7968 E uropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS). Computational analyses (biochemic al amino acid properties, conservation, AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) do not p rovide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. Additional inform ation is needed to fully assess the clinical significance of this variant. -

Dec 01, 2016
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 28, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The I2721T variant of uncertain significance in the RYR2 gene has been previously reported intwo individuals (van Spaendonck-Zwarts et al., 2014; Hertz et al., 2015). This variant was initiallyreported as a variant of uncertain significance in one individual with atrial fibrillation and dilatedcardiomyopathy who was found to harbor additional variants of uncertain significance in theDMD and TTN genes (van Spaendonck-Zwarts et al., 2014). Subsequently, Hertz et al. (2015)reported I2721T in an individual diagnosed with Long QT syndrome at 19 years of age; however,she was also found to harbor a KCNH2 variant classified as likely pathogenic. This variant hasalso been identified independently and in conjunction with additional cardiogenetic variants inindividuals referred for arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy genetic testing at GeneDx; however, thusfar, segregation data is limited or absent for these individuals due to the lack of clinical informationprovided and/or insufficient participation by informative family members. Additionally, theI2721T variant is classified in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance by two clinicallaboratories (ClinVar SCV000060449.4; SCV000285751.1; Landrum et al., 2016). The I2721Tvariant was not observed with any significant frequency in approximately 5,800 individuals ofEuropean and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project. Although thissubstitution occurs at a position where amino acids with similar properties to Isoleucine aretolerated across species, the I2721T variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which islikely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/orother properties. Consequently, in silico analysis predicts this variant is probably damaging to theprotein structure/function. Nevertheless, the I2721T variant is not located in one of the threehot-spot regions of the RYR2 gene, where the majority of pathogenic missense variants occur(Medeiros-Domingo et al., 2009).Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant ispathogenic or rare benign. -

Dec 29, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: RYR2 c.8162T>C (p.Ile2721Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Ryanodine receptor Ryr domain (IPR003032) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00057 in 137452 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0012 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 20 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RYR2 causing Arrhythmia phenotype (6e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.8162T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Arrhythmia, LQTS, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, sudden arrhythmic death syndrome and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (vanSpaendonck_2014, Hertz_2014, Landstrom_2017, Munroe_2018, Raju_2019, Coban-Akdemir_2020). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Arrhythmia. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (TTN c.86171_86174dupAAAG, p.Asn28726Lysfs*3; LMNA c.725C>T, p.Ala242Val; KCNH2 c.1286del, p.A429Vfs*5), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. 11 ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (6x) and likely benign (5x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Mar 24, 2020
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 20, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Likely Benign variant based on current evidence: This missense variant is located in the cytoplasmic domain of the RYR2 protein. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may have deleterious impact on the protein function. Computational splicing tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. To our knowledge, functional assays have not been performed for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with long QT syndrome, who also carried a pathogenic truncation variant in the KCNH2 gene (PMID: 25467552). This variant has been identified in 97/163874 chromosomes (84/68536 non-Finnish European chromosomes, 0.1225%) in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This variant allele frequency is greater than expected for the RYR2-related disorder based on prevalence, penetrance, and genetic heterogeneity. Based on available evidence, this variant is classified as Likely Benign. -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern Uncertain:1
Jul 14, 2017
Lupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of Medicine
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

This variant was identified in an individual with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Oct 01, 2016
CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

Found in patient having exome sequencing for an unrelated indication. No known history of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. This interpretation considers GERP score and allele frequency data, in addition to published reports of the variant in the literature, available at the time of review. -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Benign:1
Sep 23, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

RYR2-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 31, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jul 20, 2023
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.38
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.10
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.070
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.83
D;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.43
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.52
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.19
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.17
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.50
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.84
L;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.78
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.6
D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.59
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;.
Polyphen
0.85
P;.
Vest4
0.65
MVP
0.78
MPC
1.2
ClinPred
0.10
T
GERP RS
6.2
Varity_R
0.28
gMVP
0.43

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201500134; hg19: chr1-237821276; API