rs201819948

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_001142800.2(EYS):​c.2971C>T​(p.Leu991Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000373 in 1,545,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00039 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

EYS
NM_001142800.2 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.414
Variant links:
Genes affected
EYS (HGNC:21555): (eyes shut homolog) The product of this gene contains multiple epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like and LamG domains. The protein is expressed in the photoreceptor layer of the retina, and the gene is mutated in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04381132).
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
EYSNM_001142800.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2971C>T p.Leu991Phe missense_variant 19/43 ENST00000503581.6 NP_001136272.1
EYSNM_001292009.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2971C>T p.Leu991Phe missense_variant 19/44 NP_001278938.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EYSENST00000503581.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2971C>T p.Leu991Phe missense_variant 19/435 NM_001142800.2 ENSP00000424243 A2Q5T1H1-1
EYSENST00000370621.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2971C>T p.Leu991Phe missense_variant 19/441 ENSP00000359655 P2Q5T1H1-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000244
AC:
37
AN:
151880
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000658
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000407
AC:
62
AN:
152446
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000469
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
80956
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000133
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000579
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000341
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000473
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000388
AC:
541
AN:
1393662
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000397
AC XY:
273
AN XY:
687398
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000320
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000285
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00232
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000573
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000203
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000286
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000901
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
151996
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000256
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
74292
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000657
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000459
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000264
ExAC
AF:
0.000371
AC:
9

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinitis pigmentosa 25 Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 30, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterFeb 04, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMay 18, 2021- -
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 25, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 05, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 23, 2022Variant summary: EYS c.2971C>T (p.Leu991Phe) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the EGF-like calcium-binding domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of four in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00041 in 152446 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in EYS causing Retinitis Pigmentosa (0.00041 vs 0.0034), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.2971C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Retinitis Pigmentosa. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Retinitis Pigmentosa. This variant has been found to be in-cis with c.32dup/p.(Met12Aspfs*14) in one patient (Colombo_2021). Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (likely benign n=1, VUS n=5). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.091
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Benign
9.1
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.027
.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.98
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.11
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.46
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.074
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.044
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.69
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.3
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.056
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.097
T;T
Polyphen
0.36
B;.
Vest4
0.34
MVP
0.24
MPC
0.0098
ClinPred
0.0067
T
GERP RS
-0.11
Varity_R
0.061
gMVP
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201819948; hg19: chr6-65596611; API