rs201950015
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4BA1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The m.7476C>T variant in MT-TS1 was reviewed by the Mitochondrial Disease Nuclear and Mitochondrial Variant Curation Expert Panel as part of the variant pilot for mitochondrial DNA variant specifications (McCormick et al., 2020; PMID:32906214). This variant is seen in 1.310% of individuals in the GenBank dataset (BA1), including in haplogroups J2a (99.7% of individuals) and J2b (98.85% of individuals). Furthermore, this variant is seen in the gnomAD dataset (v3.1.2) at an overall homoplasmic allele frequency of 1% including in haplogroup J at 20%. If an affected individual is not a member this haplogroup, further evaluation of the variant in that particular individual should be considered. The computational predictor MitoTIP suggests this variant does not impact the function of this tRNA with a score in the 20th percentile, as does HmtVar with a score of 0.1 (BP4). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. This classification was approved by the NICHD U24 Mitochondrial Disease Variant Curation Expert Panel as of August 20, 2020. Mitochondrial DNA-specific ACMG/AMP criteria applied: BA1, BP4. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA131013/MONDO:0044970/014
Frequency
Consequence
unassigned_transcript_4800 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000387416.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are no transcript annotations for this variant. | |||||||||
Ensembl Transcripts
Frequencies
Mitomap
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source: