rs201988582

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):c.1092T>G(p.Ile364Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000521 in 1,321,500 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. I364I) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00065 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00050 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
NM_025114.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:16B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.50

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CEP290 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008333027).

BP6

Variant 12-88125343-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88125343-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 281250.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=15, Likely_benign=5}. Variant chr12-88125343-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1092T>G	p.Ile364Met	missense_variant	13/54	ENST00000552810.6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.1092T>G	p.Ile364Met	missense_variant	13/54	1	NM_025114.4	P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000652

AC:

AN:

151928

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000591

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000384

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00310

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000958

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000975

AC:

AN:

87176

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00132

AC XY:

AN XY:

46988

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000241

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00348

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000959

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00243

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000505

AC:

590

AN:

1169454

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000600

AC XY:

344

AN XY:

573114

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000435

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000354

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00324

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000459

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000413

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000706

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000651

AC:

AN:

152046

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000686

AC XY:

AN XY:

74330

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000722

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000590

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000385

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00311

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000958

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00189

Alfa

AF:

0.000833

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000582

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000258

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000578

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00145

AC:

AN:

3472

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:16Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Joubert syndrome 5

Uncertain:3

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	May 18, 2021	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	research	Molecular Medicine for Neurodegenerative and Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris	Jul 12, 2021	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14

Uncertain:3

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Christian Medical College	-	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jul 14, 2021	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 4

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jul 14, 2021	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jul 14, 2021	- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 04, 2019	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Oct 01, 2023	- -

Stuve-Wiedemann syndrome 2

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School

Aug 09, 2023

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Natera, Inc.

Apr 17, 2020

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

DBGen Ocular Genomics

Jun 01, 2021

- -

Kidney disorder

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

May 10, 2021

- -

CEP290-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Aug 07, 2018

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Aug 10, 2016

- -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Jan 31, 2024

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Mar 29, 2016

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.18

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.22

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.090

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.45

.;T;T;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.59

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.57

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.82

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.89

D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.033

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0083

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.64

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.4

.;M;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

D;D;D

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.64

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.5

N;N;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.21

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;.;.

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.014

D;D;T;T

Polyphen

1.0

.;D;.;.

Vest4

0.80

MVP

0.70

MPC

0.35

ClinPred

0.060

GERP RS

4.3

Varity_R

0.42

gMVP

0.46

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over