Menu
GeneBe

rs202052259

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_000222.3(KIT):c.910A>G(p.Thr304Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000136 in 1,613,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T304T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

KIT
NM_000222.3 missense

Scores

9
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:5B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.17
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIT (HGNC:6342): (KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase. This gene was initially identified as a homolog of the feline sarcoma viral oncogene v-kit and is often referred to as proto-oncogene c-Kit. The canonical form of this glycosylated transmembrane protein has an N-terminal extracellular region with five immunoglobulin-like domains, a transmembrane region, and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain at the C-terminus. Upon activation by its cytokine ligand, stem cell factor (SCF), this protein phosphorylates multiple intracellular proteins that play a role in in the proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis of many cell types and thereby plays an important role in hematopoiesis, stem cell maintenance, gametogenesis, melanogenesis, and in mast cell development, migration and function. This protein can be a membrane-bound or soluble protein. Mutations in this gene are associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, mast cell disease, acute myelogenous leukemia, and piebaldism. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, KIT
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.022070289).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00014 (205/1461190) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00502 (199/39674). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00444. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 99 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 14 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KITNM_000222.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.910A>G p.Thr304Ala missense_variant 5/21 ENST00000288135.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KITENST00000288135.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.910A>G p.Thr304Ala missense_variant 5/211 NM_000222.3 P4P10721-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000920
AC:
14
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000207
AC:
52
AN:
251326
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000162
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
135840
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00277
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000140
AC:
205
AN:
1461190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000136
AC XY:
99
AN XY:
726978
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00502
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
9.00e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000919
AC:
14
AN:
152324
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000107
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000499
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000756
ExAC
AF:
0.000198
AC:
24
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:5Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSt. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalJul 05, 2022The KIT c.910A>G (p.Thr304Ala) missense change has a maximum frequency of 0.28% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL is inconclusive about a pathogenic or benign effect of this variant on protein function, and to our knowledge functional studies have not been performed. This variant has been reported in an individual with piebaldism who harbored a second missense variant in KIT however it was not known if the variants were on the same or opposite alleles (PMID: 25176472). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 21, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 21, 2019The p.T304A variant (also known as c.910A>G), located in coding exon 5 of the KIT gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 910. The threonine at codon 304 is replaced by alanine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration was seen in a patient with piebaldism who was also positive for another alteration in the KIT gene, p.E583D (Lee H et al. J. Dermatol. Sci., 2014 Oct;76:74-6). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 18, 2021- -
Ovarian cancer Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, flagged submissionclinical testingLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan UniversityJan 01, 2022- -
Piebaldism Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Mastocytosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.093
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.13
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.030
Cadd
Benign
21
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.51
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.55
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.59
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.051
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.022
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.39
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.4
M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.53
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.53
Sift
Benign
0.52
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.50
T;T
Polyphen
0.78
P;D
Vest4
0.42
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.69
ClinPred
0.094
T
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.90

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs202052259; hg19: chr4-55570043; COSMIC: COSV55399408; API