rs2066830

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):​c.1641C>T​(p.Ser547Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0113 in 1,613,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 125 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0078 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 116 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.910
Variant links:
Genes affected
PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).
BP6
Variant 9-95476121-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95476121-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 132700.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-95476121-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.91 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00784 (1194/152322) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0128 (870/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0121. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 574 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1194 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PTCH1NM_000264.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1641C>T p.Ser547Ser synonymous_variant 12/24 ENST00000331920.11 NP_000255.2 Q13635-1
PTCH1NM_001083603.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1638C>T p.Ser546Ser synonymous_variant 12/24 ENST00000437951.6 NP_001077072.1 Q13635-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PTCH1ENST00000331920.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1641C>T p.Ser547Ser synonymous_variant 12/245 NM_000264.5 ENSP00000332353.6 Q13635-1
PTCH1ENST00000437951.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1638C>T p.Ser546Ser synonymous_variant 12/245 NM_001083603.3 ENSP00000389744.2 Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00784
AC:
1194
AN:
152204
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00273
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0307
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00491
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00885
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0128
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00623
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00784
AC:
1957
AN:
249624
Hom.:
14
AF XY:
0.00797
AC XY:
1076
AN XY:
134956
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00224
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00255
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000597
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000987
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00771
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0116
AC:
16959
AN:
1461198
Hom.:
116
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0111
AC XY:
8103
AN XY:
726872
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00194
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00269
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000651
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00830
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00784
AC:
1194
AN:
152322
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00771
AC XY:
574
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00272
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00885
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0128
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00616
Alfa
AF:
0.00975
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00727
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0117
EpiControl
AF:
0.0112

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 30, 2016Variant summary: The PTCH1 c.1641C>T (p.Ser547Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect multiple ESE sites. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 994/110038 control chromosomes (7 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0090332, which is approximately 527 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic PTCH1 variant (0.0000171), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratory classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 22, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024PTCH1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoApr 23, 2021- -
Gorlin syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 20, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Holoprosencephaly 7 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.34
CADD
Benign
7.8
DANN
Benign
0.88
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2066830; hg19: chr9-98238403; COSMIC: COSV59461249; COSMIC: COSV59461249; API