Menu
GeneBe

rs2070825

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001110556.2(FLNA):c.5850T>C(p.Ala1950=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.138 in 1,209,033 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11,142 homozygotes. There are 54,049 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.22 ( 3218 hom., 7419 hem., cov: 25)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.13 ( 7924 hom. 46630 hem. )

Consequence

FLNA
NM_001110556.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.47
Variant links:
Genes affected
FLNA (HGNC:3754): (filamin A) The protein encoded by this gene is an actin-binding protein that crosslinks actin filaments and links actin filaments to membrane glycoproteins. The encoded protein is involved in remodeling the cytoskeleton to effect changes in cell shape and migration. This protein interacts with integrins, transmembrane receptor complexes, and second messengers. Defects in this gene are a cause of several syndromes, including periventricular nodular heterotopias (PVNH1, PVNH4), otopalatodigital syndromes (OPD1, OPD2), frontometaphyseal dysplasia (FMD), Melnick-Needles syndrome (MNS), and X-linked congenital idiopathic intestinal pseudoobstruction (CIIPX). Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant X-154353564-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-154353564-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 93766.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-154353564-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.47 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.486 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
FLNANM_001110556.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.5850T>C p.Ala1950= synonymous_variant 36/48 ENST00000369850.10
FLNANM_001456.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5826T>C p.Ala1942= synonymous_variant 35/47

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
FLNAENST00000369850.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.5850T>C p.Ala1950= synonymous_variant 36/481 NM_001110556.2 P21333-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.223
AC:
24965
AN:
112013
Hom.:
3205
Cov.:
25
AF XY:
0.216
AC XY:
7380
AN XY:
34245
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.492
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00437
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.187
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0560
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0933
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.134
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0588
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.107
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.194
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.155
AC:
28172
AN:
181171
Hom.:
2226
AF XY:
0.146
AC XY:
9788
AN XY:
67041
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.505
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.205
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0541
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0735
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.147
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.102
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.117
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.129
AC:
141332
AN:
1096966
Hom.:
7924
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.129
AC XY:
46630
AN XY:
362626
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.503
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.202
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0588
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.108
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.201
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.142
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.111
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.144
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.223
AC:
25028
AN:
112067
Hom.:
3218
Cov.:
25
AF XY:
0.216
AC XY:
7419
AN XY:
34309
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.492
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.187
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0560
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0925
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.209
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.134
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.107
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.205
Alfa
AF:
0.138
Hom.:
2967
Bravo
AF:
0.240
EpiCase
AF:
0.102
EpiControl
AF:
0.0903

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 05, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 19, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 10, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClaritas GenomicsApr 17, 2012- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 30, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Melnick-Needles syndrome;C0265293:Frontometaphyseal dysplasia;C1844696:Oto-palato-digital syndrome, type II;C1848213:Heterotopia, periventricular, X-linked dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 22, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
Cadd
Benign
8.6
Dann
Benign
0.58

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2070825; hg19: chrX-153581932; COSMIC: COSV61039995; COSMIC: COSV61039995; API