rs2071089

chr19-38512085-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BA1

The NM_000540.3(RYR1):c.9186A>G(p.Pro3062=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.282 in 1,613,272 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 68,314 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.33 (8735 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.28 (59579 hom.)
• Consequence: RYR1 NM_000540.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1 B:16 O:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -3.60

Genes affected

RYR1 (HGNC:10483): (ryanodine receptor 1) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in skeletal muscle. The encoded protein functions as a calcium release channel in the sarcoplasmic reticulum but also serves to connect the sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubule. Mutations in this gene are associated with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility, central core disease, and minicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia. Alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
• BP6: Variant 19-38512085-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-38512085-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 93306.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-38512085-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.6 with no splicing effect.
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.444 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
RYR1	NM_000540.3	c.9186A>G	p.Pro3062=	synonymous_variant	62/106	ENST00000359596.8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
RYR1	ENST00000359596.8	c.9186A>G	p.Pro3062=	synonymous_variant	62/106	5	NM_000540.3	A2
RYR1	ENST00000355481.8	c.9186A>G	p.Pro3062=	synonymous_variant	62/105	1		P4
RYR1	ENST00000594335.5	c.2590A>G	p.Ser864Gly	missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant	22/49	1
RYR1	ENST00000599547.6	c.9173-160A>G		intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant		2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.328 AC: 49829 AN: 151898 Hom.: 8693 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.431

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.260

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.355

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.258

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.363

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.460

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.300

Gnomad MID AF: 0.316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.256

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.333

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.323 AC: 80831 AN: 250422 Hom.: 13921 AF XY: 0.323 AC XY: 43687 AN XY: 135412

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.438

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.391

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.244

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.339

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.458

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.306

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.258

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.306

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.278 AC: 405672 AN: 1461256 Hom.: 59579 Cov.: 45 AF XY: 0.282 AC XY: 205032 AN XY: 726908

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.433

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.387

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.253

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.338

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.447

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.304

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.251

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.295

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.328 AC: 49932 AN: 152016 Hom.: 8735 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.336 AC XY: 24946 AN XY: 74280

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.432

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.356

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.258

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.363

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.460

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.300

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.256

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.338

Alfa AF: 0.274 Hom.: 8307

Bravo AF: 0.334

Asia WGS AF: 0.487 AC: 1692 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.265

EpiControl AF: 0.264

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:16 Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Jun 06, 2014	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	Apr 03, 2018	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Aug 15, 2013	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jan 25, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Jan 13, 2015	p.Pro3062Pro in exon 62 of RYR1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 42.7% (1882/4406) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequ encing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2071089). -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -

not provided Uncertain:1 Other:1

not provided, no classification provided	literature only	Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (RYR1)	-	- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System	-	Allele frequency is common in at least one population database (frequency: 45.77% in gnomAD_Exomes) based on the frequency threshold of 2.223% for this gene. Variant was observed in a homozygous state in population databases more than expected for disease. 9 reputable source/s reports the variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation. A synonymous variant not located in a splice region. -

Congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Nov 07, 2021	- -

Central core myopathy Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Nov 07, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jun 14, 2016	- -

Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Mar 29, 2019	- -

RYR1-related disorder Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Feb 01, 2024

- -

Neuromuscular disease, congenital, with uniform type 1 fiber Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jun 14, 2016

- -

King Denborough syndrome Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome-Nilou Lab

Nov 07, 2021

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.91
Cadd	Benign	0.023
Dann	Benign	0.45

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.010		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2071089; hg19: chr19-39002725; COSMIC: COSV62097511;