rs2075961

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000308.4(CTSA):​c.948+7G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.647 in 1,613,730 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 338,948 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.66 ( 32804 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.65 ( 306144 hom. )

Consequence

CTSA
NM_000308.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002833
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.153

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTSA (HGNC:9251): (cathepsin A) This gene encodes a member of the peptidase S10 family of serine carboxypeptidases. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate two chains that comprise the heterodimeric active enzyme. This enzyme possesses deamidase, esterase and carboxypeptidase activities and acts as a scaffold in the lysosomal multienzyme complex. Mutations in this gene are associated with galactosialidosis. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
CTSA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • galactosialidosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, ClinGen, Illumina

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 20-45894908-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-45894908-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 338535.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.71 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000308.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CTSA
NM_000308.4
MANE Select
c.948+7G>A
splice_region intron
N/ANP_000299.3
CTSA
NM_001127695.3
c.948+7G>A
splice_region intron
N/ANP_001121167.1
CTSA
NM_001167594.3
c.897+7G>A
splice_region intron
N/ANP_001161066.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CTSA
ENST00000646241.3
MANE Select
c.948+7G>A
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000493613.2
CTSA
ENST00000372484.8
TSL:1
c.1002+7G>A
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000361562.3
CTSA
ENST00000191018.9
TSL:1
c.948+7G>A
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000191018.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.656
AC:
99603
AN:
151776
Hom.:
32769
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.664
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.594
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.721
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.534
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.693
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.679
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.702
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.592
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.633
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.643
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.664
AC:
167046
AN:
251434
AF XY:
0.658
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.664
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.779
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.512
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.690
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.690
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.632
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.645
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.646
AC:
944114
AN:
1461836
Hom.:
306144
Cov.:
62
AF XY:
0.645
AC XY:
469373
AN XY:
727228
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.660
AC:
22087
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.773
AC:
34578
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.522
AC:
13638
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.726
AC:
28836
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.677
AC:
58395
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.690
AC:
36851
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.580
AC:
3343
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.637
AC:
707916
AN:
1111972
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.637
AC:
38470
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
21920
43840
65761
87681
109601
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18858
37716
56574
75432
94290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.656
AC:
99696
AN:
151894
Hom.:
32804
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.661
AC XY:
49014
AN XY:
74204
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.664
AC:
27502
AN:
41398
American (AMR)
AF:
0.722
AC:
11004
AN:
15248
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.534
AC:
1852
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.693
AC:
3573
AN:
5156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.680
AC:
3277
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.702
AC:
7387
AN:
10530
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.602
AC:
177
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.633
AC:
43022
AN:
67956
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.645
AC:
1363
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1748
3496
5244
6992
8740
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
810
1620
2430
3240
4050
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.633
Hom.:
13500
Bravo
AF:
0.656
Asia WGS
AF:
0.715
AC:
2488
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Oct 19, 2015
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Jun 19, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Combined deficiency of sialidase AND beta galactosidase Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not specified Benign:1
Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 66% of total chromosomes in ExAC

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.22
DANN
Benign
0.74
PhyloP100
-0.15
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000028
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.048
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2075961; hg19: chr20-44523547; COSMIC: COSV51943002; COSMIC: COSV51943002; API